What's wrong with Intel: Former principal engineer unloads

submitted by [deleted] from (pcworld.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Any chance the plateau has been intentional? If they can rig the science, the votes, the markets, and social engineer chaos, why not keep the masses away from advanced tech too?

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Yes, I have considered that. Something like "Our turn to lead until 2015 or so, then you take the lead." But WHY? Jerry Sanders III founded AMD, it was his baby, his life's work. I can't imagine, well yeah I can, but still... All to make sure that one company does better than another? Who's gaining what?

Wait, Intel is tied in with Israel... Hm... Demonspawn at work? Hell, maybe.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

They are all tied to the deep state. Just like all banks, corporate media, military, etc. Anyone who manufactures on their own will get shut down.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Sure, but... Why pick a winner beforehand? Even the deep state benefits from competition. Unless black budget tech was generations ahead already. Who the fuck knows.

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not saying they wouldn't foster some competition - as long as they control all the competition.

Indeed, who knows.

[–]Trajan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Sure, but it requires far fewer assumptions to attribute this to incompetence.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Hanlon's razor - "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity", also in other forms, an aphorism and philosophical razor suggesting a way to eliminate unlikely explanations for behavior; often utilized in politics to oversimplify issues and excuse malice and corruption.

/s/Terminology/comments/5plw/hanlons_razor_never_attribute_to_malice_that/

Nothing is simple.