you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Oh, OK. Evo-psych started well enough, but MRAs started using it to justify women's and men's roles in society, arguing for the usual bullshit that they spew. Shortly thereafter an avalanche of scholarship decisively refuted and then buried the concept. It's one of those things where mentioning it is enough to kill your academic career now. I'd advise staying far away from it, it's in the same realm as "13% of the people commit 50% of the crimes" bullshit.

[–]Comatoast 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

So what were the funding sources for the majority of scholarly articles? Was there any bias or politics based agenda?

What do those scholarly sources have to do with refuting physiology itself and physical abilities between sexes?

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

RACIST, SEXIST, ANTI-GAY

MRA, GO AWAY!

[–]SargentBlack 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

lgbt is a disease of the spirit for which there is no vaccine available. oh my gawd, that is why they want to vaccinate us. they want to turn us all into fags.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

If you sniff carb cleaner then it will go away