all 7 comments

[–]GuyWhite 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

WaPo is fake news.

NATO signatories are required to spend a minimum on defense. It’s like 2 or 3 percent of Gross Domestic Product. If they don’t live up to their commitments, why should the US?

[–]Cancelthis 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He's been President.

The ultimate false flag.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why would anyone vote for this man who is inciting WW3 and promising to sit back and watch like it was another episode of The Apprentice?

[–]Thinger 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Are you retarded? Because you sound retarded.

[–]Dune1032 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This is a stupid remark. How can it be determined the amount a country can afford to pay? If the US disregards its obligation to defend NATO countries, why would any NATO country believe the US would fulfill its obligation if it were attacked? However, Trump's opponent is an old man with a poor memory so he can say things that would get him in trouble if he had a tougher opponent.

[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

If you're a NATO member, then you have already agreed to pay.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/8rHUfpYjV2nC/

If the US disregards its obligation to defend NATO countries, why would any NATO country believe the US would fulfill its obligation if it were attacked?

They have an obligation to pay.

[–]Dune1032 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How much? Also, some countries do not manufacture all the weapons they need.