all 8 comments

[–]zyxzevn 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The channel Military Summary makes an overview every 12 hours. Today
It does geolocating of the videos to check validity.
Not perfect, but reasonably neutral info.

Based on the daily info, the Ukraine forces have been doing suicide runs, while on drugs, with no strategic support.
They claimed victory on grey areas that are purposefully left open to create cauldrons.
Like the river area, where they are soon freezing to death.

They could have saved a lot of people by just staying in defense.
Or by not joining Nato, as you can see in the video.

[–]Dune1032 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Russia launched a two-pronged attack in 2022 in an attempt to take Kyiv, but Russian military incompetence and ferocious Ukrainian resistance forced the Russians to abandon the assault. Russia did not just play defense. They attacked Bakhmut. Presently they are attacking Avdiivka. Russian losses are far greater than that of Ukraine. The reason is the use of human wave attacks. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwkIsnTn01E&t=64s 1:39 into video. The Russians use this tactic because of their vast manpower. Ukraine because of their limited manpower is more careful in how they're used. In their 2023 counteroffensive, Ukraine had to abandon large scale attacks because they were suffering unsustainable losses attempting to break through deep minefields. Consequently, Ukraine had to resort to small unit assaults. Russia's present strategy is probably a war of attrition hoping that the West will abandon Ukraine. Ukraine's strategy is probably to wait until the F-16s arrive. In the meantime, they can hit targets deep in Russian-held territory with their longer range ATACMs.

[–]Bigs 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

lol, that was cute

[–]neolib 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

This is another pro-Russian anonymous blogger, so everything should be taken with an enormous grain of salt. Especially "Ukrainian casualties have been so astronomical" - there's no source for that, not even in reputable Russian media.

Last more or less credible numbers I saw were these (in the middle of counteroffensive, so could be closer now):

https://saidit.net/s/WarWatch/comments/bccl/russias_military_casualties_the_us_officials_said/

[–]MuskyIndependent[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

there's no source for that, not even in reputable Russian media.

The Discord leaks had the Pentagon estimating 176k casualties on the Ukranian side.

[–]neolib 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No, some screenshots were edited (and spread by pro-Russian bloggers), the initial one shared on 4chan showed 17k KIA for Ukraine (Mar 2023):

https://saidit.net/s/Geopolitics/comments/axqe/i_dont_think_russia_is_incompetent_but_the_guy/12hbk

[–]MuskyIndependent[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

(The second one is blurrier just because I did a crappy screenshot on my phone)

👀 How does that work?

So apparently there's no non-blurry copy of this supposedly fake misinformation edited by Russian hax0rs and the only thing the hackers did all war was to change unbelievable fatality numbers to believable ones when neither Ukraine or Russia seemed to care about the leak otherwise.

[–]neolib 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Do you want me to find an archive of the initial 4chan thread, when nothing about the leak was known at all? Just some random guy shared these pictures in the thread when arguing about the war, and that's when journalists/osinters start to dig and found the discord servers and everything.

I saved my copy (https://files.catbox.moe/7lk6a9.png, my upload) from that very thread when it was still live on 4chan (found it by googling Post ID from a twitter screenshot).

Background refresher: 2022–2023 Pentagon document leaks