Roseanne is based

submitted by MuskyIndependent from midi.moe

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]binaryblob 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (25 children)

If by based you meant stupid, then yes.

[–]g0ldfish 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (22 children)

Indeed. She's explained in the shortest possible manner the many deranged disinformation talking points by the far right, while also showing her and their massive egos and minimal qualities. She's always been trash, and wrong, but this comment, by her or by some staff member, is remarkably concise. I think it's an excellent summary, from someone in an alternate MAGAtard universe that most Americans don't see on social media and elsewhere.

EDIT: I see now on her Twitter feed that she and her staff are full-time far right political hacks. She's as disgusting as she ever was, though now focused on the only minority that would like incredibly nasty scumballs like her and Trump.

[–]MuskyIndependent[S] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

Nothing she said is untrue.

[–]g0ldfish 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

I upvoted your post, for the reasons noted above.

All of her claims are false. (It's impossible to support any of her claims with facts, evidence and logical arguments.)

Something else this comment shows me is that Twitter has changed a lot - and is now weaponized with thousands of far right shills (and bots): https://twitter.com/GeorgeTakei/status/1692609638292754677

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

All of your claims are false. You are an embarrassment to my country.

[–]g0ldfish 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

Re-read my comments, genius. It's impossible to support any of her claims with facts, evidence and logical arguments. You're obviously wrong. You can't support your statement.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Biden was found with classified documents in his home, something Democrats consider a crime when Trump has documents.

Biden is trying to get Trump put in jail.

The FBI colluded with big tech to suppress the Hunter laptop story ahead of the election, this was election interference.

Hunter Biden smoked crack and fucked whores with the bribes he earned from the bullshit company he was on the board of, what a glamorous look the the white house.

The Bidens are accused of bribery and corruption with the dealings with Ukraine and China. What a coincidence that immediately after getting presidential power they send money back to Ukraine.

For every crime Trump is accused of, Biden can be accused of the same or worse.

Let me take a quote from Roseanne that fits you: "All you're doing is admitting your brainwashed and ill informed".

[–]g0ldfish 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Biden was found with classified documents in his home, something Democrats consider a crime when Trump has documents.

Politicians are regularly asked to return classified documents. Biden did, immediately. (He's been in politics for decades and in the past few decades there was not the same diligence for sorting one's papers.) Trump refused to return his documents and he shared them openly with people without security clearance. THAT's the crime. Your support of Trump's illegal actiities by comparing him to a law-abiding politician is really misguided.

Biden is trying to get Trump put in jail.

No - again you have NO evidence of that. Biden does NOT order the federal lawyers and judges to act. That would be illegal, of course, and there is absolutely no trace of such activity. Stop lying, or find that evidence (which does NOT exist). Your support of Trump's illegal actiities by repeating obvious lies that the corpse of Biden is masterminding a project of numerous federal lawyers prosecuting him is a form of treason against US democracy. Moreover, those are actual crimes, which are almost unheard of in presidential politics.

The FBI colluded with big tech to suppress the Hunter laptop story ahead of the election, this was election interference.

This is another lie. Hunter's property was always private and no one should have had the right to share that private information. It is a legal obligation in the US to try to protect the privacy of its citizens. Hunter was prosecuted, in relation to the contents that were stolen from him, and faced 3 very minor charges (2 tax misdemeanors and one gun possession charge). The public does not have the moral right to view his private materials.

Hunter Biden smoked crack and fucked whores with the bribes he earned from the bullshit company he was on the board of, what a glamorous look the the white house.

He's not been charged with bribery or any of this. It's not been legally proven that he accepted bribes. His actions were not deemed to be illegal. This is also entirely unrelated to the 91 charges against Trump. It's an obvious attempt to support Trump's ACTUAL crimes, which is your way of supporting political corruption.

The Bidens are accused of bribery and corruption with the dealings with Ukraine and China. What a coincidence that immediately after getting presidential power they send money back to Ukraine.

Again - there is NO evidence that any money that changed hands resulted in US policy decisions. Hence - this is NOT bribery. The money is unrelated to politics, as it was part of a business transaction that is NOT linked to politics. Look it up. This is an obvious attempt to support Trump's ACTUAL crimes, which is your way of supporting political corruption.

For every crime Trump is accused of, Biden can be accused of the same or worse.

Absolutely false. There are numerous crimes by Trump and his family (on the behalf of the family) that one can see evidence of online. We've known this for YEARS. 91 criminal charges basically scratches the surface. There was a website - corrupt.af - that listed on a daily basis 10s of thousands of references to corruption allegations. The BILLIONS of dollars taken by the Trump family in those years should be addressed. You want to compare all of that to 2 fucking tax misdemeanors and a gun possession charge? Again, this is an obvious attempt to support Trump's ACTUAL crimes, which is your way of supporting political corruption.

Let me take a quote from Roseanne that fits you: "All you're doing is admitting your brainwashed and ill informed".

This is another obvious strategy by brainwashed far right nutjobs to defend themselves, by calling normal people brainwashed, without any evidence of that brainwashing. Indeed, far right scum like Roseanne Barr know exactly what they're doing when spreading lies and claiming that anyone not believing in those lies is somehow brainwashed. Indeed you've not provided any reasonable evidence for your claims in this thread and you've avoided entirely the facts of the 91 criminal charges. Here's how to spot the brainwashed person: see if he or she can provide the appropriate arguments or vidence for their claims. Regarding the 91 criminal charges that you and others want to claim are 'retarded' (whatever that means), you've got NOTHING in response to those. Lawyers who discovered those charges have followed a legal investigative process that is of course unrelated to brainwashing.

Zom I'd be surprised if you've taken A-levels in the UK. I've seen in the past 2 years that you seem to avoid anything that is complex or deep. You seem to prefer simplified narratives. Perhaps I am wrong, but this attempt of yours to dismiss 91 criminal charges as 'retarded' is of course ridiculous, by any standard. It's like you're trolling me, if you actually understand any of this. Please don't respond to me in the future with these baseless claims. Please look up the information before responding.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Increasing the word count of your responses does not validate them, nor does a personal attack on my intelligence.

It is indeed perfectly acceptable for politicians to hold documents in their possession and return them on request. The difference here is that Trump is called a criminal for doing the same. I could be wrong but I don't recall Trump refusing to hand over anything, and even if he did, it would likely have been his right to hold documents given to him as an ex-president until asked for them back. You see, what you do is justify the actions of one side using the same reasoning that you condemn the other. It is bizarre and frankly, I'm not sure anyone could lack the self-awareness to do this by accident.

What motivation do you have for defending Hunter fucking Biden of all people? The FBI knew the contents of the laptop and instructed social media giants to withhold the story, a story which would significantly impact the election. The public have a right to be informed. The FBI is also entitled to investigate any suspicious activities, such as those on Hunters laptop. It isn't standard protocol to withhold news when things are suspected, alleged, or under investigation, with the exception perhaps of when it could affect national security, which this did not. In fact, if this were to happen to a candidate not of your liking, I fully believe you would condemn the actions.

[–]g0ldfish 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I spent 20 or 30 minutes kindly responding to each of your baseless claims in order, only to get this unhinged, idiotic response regarding word count and with more baseless nonsense. It's as if you've not bothered to read any of the responses, none of which defends anyone. Trump refused to hand over the documents, for over a year. Look it up. Look up all of this. Leave me alone. Ask users elsewhere who have the patience to respond to you. You're repeating the same lies without backing up any of your claims with reliable evidence or arguments. And you still have absolutely nothing to argue about any of the 91 criminal charges against Trump. You don't need me to teach you internet search skills. Look it up.

[–]MuskyIndependent[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Twitter has changed a lot but I don't think it's bots and shills so much as that's just what happens when you don't censor social media users.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

She didn't say anything. She just posed questions that suggest untrue things, but would be harder to sue for libel.

She did say "Actually George honey, it IS because he’s a criminal who will destroy our democracy."

And that's not true.

[–]KyleIsThisTall 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

What a long winded way to broadcast that you are brainwashed.

[–]g0ldfish 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You're the one who is brainwashed. She's merely parroted a series of disinformation talking points from far right media. You won't be able to support any of her claims with appropriate arguments and evidence. If you think you can, try it, and I'll show you how wrong each point is.

[–]KyleIsThisTall 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There is literally evidence proving this propaganda is false

But zognald trumpstein is in on it

[–]g0ldfish 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Seems you didn't understand what I wrote.

She's merely parroted a series of disinformation talking points from far right media. You won't be able to support any of her claims with appropriate arguments and evidence. If you think you can, try it, and I'll show you how wrong each point is.

[–]KyleIsThisTall 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ah facts that are verifiably true are disinformation got it

[–]chadwickofwv 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Such a fitting username.

[–]KyleIsThisTall 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nice projection