all 22 comments

[–]notafed 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

There's a reason the NYT is referred to as "The New York Slimes" in some corners.

[–]LarrySwinger2Voluntaryist 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I had a NYT paper in my hands once as it happened to be lying in the train (in the Netherlands) and it was so highly ascribed when it was so clearly propagandistic. This was before I was redpilled. One flip through the paper was enough for me to draw my conclusions.

[–]Oyveygoyim 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

The jew york times are evil

https://www.imgbly.com/ib/1bKQPEAiko.jpg

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Adversity scores?

Get rewarded for pity points.

[–]Oyveygoyim 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anything that causes division is what the jew wants for white nations

[–]Alienhunter 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Classic feminist rage. I'm all for giving women options to pursue the kind of life they want, but that also means if they want to pursue the traditional stay at home and make sandwiches type of life, more power to them.

Radical Feminists hate it because they aren't happy but they take the toxic route where instead of just dealing with their own problems and either making peace with the fact they aren't happy or working to do things that will make them happy, the find other people who seem happy and start dunking on them and criticizing them since misery wants company.

To be fair not everyone is going to be happy with the same lifestyle, but who cares if someone else is happy doing what they like. If someone wants to climb the corporate ladder let them. If someone wants to be a stay at home mom let them. There's benefits and downsides to every choice in life. Why care if other people aren't chosing the same lifestyle you have?

[–]BobOki 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Ask any 2nd wave feminist (you know, the ones that want equality), they all will say they utterly hate 3rd wave feminists and that they are all just misandrists and are putting women's rights back decades, and are FAR more restrictive to woman-kind them most men have been.

[–]Alienhunter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Most feminists I've met IRL I get along fine with once they realize my criticisms against feminists and women in general aren't necessarily aimed at them and are simply generalizations.

I think most women are idiots, but I think most men are also idiots. So we do have some common ground there.

[–]BobOki 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh ABSOLUTLY, I am not giving men a pass, just like I do not give either political party a pass. 3rd wave feminists are a lot like incels, they hate the opposite sex, blame then for all the evils in the world, and usually want them all killed. It is a shit show by shit people, only difference is feminists are praised, while incels are demonized by both sexes.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[removed]

    [–]Alienhunter 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    One of the funniest things I've seen is the western man who thinks Asian women are submissive.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I would say "stupid and arrogant" as to what will happen to them when sanity is restored and they face the music for how they have betrayed all the people

      [–]chinamancometh 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      upper society is run by guys who can't get laid. theres no jewish conspiracy, its just a bunch of jewish nerds who are angry at getting rejected by wimmenz.

      [–]Dune1032 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      The NY Times didn't attack her. She just thought it was sexiest to title the article about her "Sex Sells." Actually, the article should have been titled "Beauty Sells." Beauty does sell. What's wrong with that?

      [–]KyleIsThisTall 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      [–]LarrySwinger2Voluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      [–]rio- 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      wow

      [–]UncleWillard56 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      But, but, but, the NYT is a paragon of journalistic integrity. Like when they wrote the hit pieces on the trans cyclist, the trans swimmer, and the trans weightlifter for using transitioning to go from almost mediocre male athletes to record-breaking "female" athletes. Fair and balanced!

      /s!

      [–]songruixi 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Ask one thing,where is WPD

      [–]smsfree 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      envy is bad

      [–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      propagandists not journalists