Alex Jones claims they want to take his expensive cat because he's bankrupt. "This is Mushu," Jones said, cradling the animal in his arms. He estimated the cat was worth around $2,000. "They were very serious about the cat and its value, and they may want the cat" he said. He claimed harassment.

submitted by Orangutan from (news.yahoo.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Drewski 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Sounds like hearsay to me. If you have any credible sources I'll check them out. Regardless I still recommend the episode, he makes a lot of salient points. Just the fact that Jones was fined that massive amount of money for making a claim, true or not (which he later retracted), shows the insanity of the current legal system.

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

https://youtube.com/@kasterlynchfarrarballllp7305

Enjoy

Nothing insane about the amounts awarded.

https://saidit.net/s/politics/comments/aftl/alex_jones_claims_they_want_to_take_his_expensive/11b2z

[–]Drewski 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

You just linked to 30 hours of videos from the Infowars disposition. I was asking about a source for Robert Barnes not being credible.

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Here is Paz's deposition

https://youtu.be/YIczy1avGDs

1:51:36 - the list of lawyers on the case. Wait til you hear her reaction to Barnes name coming up. It's hilarious

1:56:21 - the topic of legal malpractice as an asset

But if you really were interested in that case - the channel is the one of the law firms for the parents. The videos are all Infowars under deposition. You can learn an awful lot about their inner workings and how they ended up owing 1 billion. It's also quite entertaining to watch the morons squirm

[–]milkmender11 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Well my leg is warm and wet and smells of ammonia, but you're telling me it's raining, so it must be rain. I should have brought an umbrella! Never can predict these sudden showers.

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I don't know what you mean here, sorry. What are you trying to indicate. Are you saying I'm wrong about Infowars corporate representative saying under oath in deposition that the company are considering suing Barnes for malpractice?

[–]milkmender11 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I'm saying that I feel a warm, odorous liquid oozing down my leg, as you stand directly adjacent to me with your fly unzipped. Your finger, however, points to the sky. I do not see clouds nor is my head wet.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

"Pissing on my leg and telling me it's raining"

It's a saying used by smarter people than yourself.

It's used to signify when someone is trying to convince you of something in the face of all evidence.

The saying doesn't really have any relevance here so I don't get why you keep making this childish post.

You replied to a comment with a link and timestamps. That's my evidence for the claim that Infowars are considering suing Barnes for his malpractice. It's a video of Infowars corporate representative saying exactly that.

Here's what you're trying to do:

  • pissing on your leg = telling you a lie about Barnes

  • telling you it's raining = misdirecting you with a fake claim

What are you even trying to do? It just doesn't work. You come off as a moron. I linked and timestamped my evidence. You should have given up on this childish charade as soon as you saw a youtube link

[–]milkmender11 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Geez you are really angry about this. Clearly you are on the spectrum so I should probably spell it out for you, but I want to see if you can figure it out on your own. First, throw your entire post away. You completely missed the point because you are oblivious to social cues online as well as IRL (I know it creates problems for you, my sympathies).

I'm not saying you are lying about Barnes. Spectrum folk do tend to make this type of error, underfitting to the data, seeing the trees but not the forest. What might I have been saying? Take another shot at it. If you still can't grasp it, I'll explain what you missed. Good luck!

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not at all angry my friend, just a bit confused but more pitying you for how difficult it must be for someone with your level of autism to communicate their thoughts with other people.

https://saidit.net/s/politics/comments/aftl/alex_jones_claims_they_want_to_take_his_expensive/11b3c

That's what you were replying to originally.

Your reply was basically a non sequitur. I can't read your mind, but you didn't know that, because it's hard for you guys with the extra chromosome to put yourselves in other people's mindstates.

So explain it or don't, I maybe would have cared to hear it a few days ago, but you've since shown yourself as unrecoverably syndromed so it doesn't really matter to be either way