Tucker Carlson: Twitter was permanently censoring users at the request of the DNC and Biden campaign

submitted by AXXA from youtube.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (67 children)

jewish corruption is everywhere, Trump and Biden, pay for play, ukraine and china and more. I care not for red jew or blue jew team sports.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (66 children)

I care not for red jew or blue jew team sports.

The question was: why don't you care about the six crimes which you were insistent that I read about.

The answer is: because they are only narratives which you enjoy as fiction and don't need to be grounded in reality.

Your entire conspiritard worldview is made up from pleasant stories like "six crimes!"

There's no facts here like you insisted.

It's quite funny to me that your brain isn't letting you acknowledge that.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (65 children)

says the guy that's too lazy to read all or part of the pdf that was spoon fed to him.

do you expect me to have a more compelling argument than subject matter experts?

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (64 children)

too lazy to read all or part

You did, though, right? You read it. Right?

Should be easy to name one of the six really important crimes and explain what evidence there is to back it up.

Should be really easy because you read it and you thought it was an important document.

Should be really easy but for some reason your brain is having difficulties.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Should be easy to name one of the six really important crimes and explain what evidence there is to back it up.

I already named it you jew shill, 'pay for play'. Aka bribery.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Okay now we're getting somewhere.

You think the twitter stuff is relevant because it ties into a document you read, which said that President Biden committed the crime of bribery.

So can you lay out any more information? Who did the president bribe and what evidence is there?

Please try to say it in words instead of just saying that it's somewhere within a 650 page document

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

make your own post and I will debate you there, for the whole site to see, shlomo

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (60 children)

Further evidence that Joe expected to receive a slice of his son’s income was provided by Tony Bobulinksi, Hunter’s former business partner in a firm called Oneida, which was set up to enter a joint venture with the Chinese energy conglomerate CEFC. Bobulinski says that Joe was the “big guy” referred to in a 2017 e-mail who was to be allocated 10 percent equity in the firm: “10 [percent] held by H [Hunter] for the big guy.”

https://nypost.com/2021/07/04/hunter-biden-engaged-in-some-daddy-pay-care-devine/

This is an impeachable offense imo.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (59 children)

Can you lay out what is impeachable?

Impeach him because someone said his son held 10% of a company "for" then-senator Biden five years ago.

Can we make a general rule which all presidents and senators should be held to. Like - if an official's family member holds equity in a company then the family must clarify the beneficial relationship. And if the family don't clarify their internal equity flows, then the official should be impeached.

I just wonder how this came to be an impeachable act, in your mind. Because it wasn't wrong for four years when trump was in charge, so clearly something happened when Biden took over that made it retrospectively wrong in 2017.

Let me ask you this: would you support an investigation into trump and Biden family finances or would that be a witch hunt?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (58 children)

Let me ask you this: would you support an investigation into trump and Biden family finances or would that be a witch hunt?

You fucking bot, I already explained my position on this. Yes, we should investigate all of these jew feds.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (57 children)

Then why didn't you have a problem with "opaque family holdings" during the prior administration? Why has it only now become impeachable?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (56 children)

Can you lay out what is impeachable?

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (55 children)

You told me that opaque family holdings were impeachable

You wrote

This is an impeachable offense imo.

I am interested in creating a general rule about lawmakers and their family investments.

But I'm not such a baby to selectively enforce it against one party only.