Nope. The evidence clearly says they usually needed a police/court order to ban material because it was from a hacked source

Where does the evidence say that? Are you really trying to tell me that you think twitter can't take down material on their own platform without a court order?

Did you even read the tweet you linked? It says they had a crazy "whirlwind" time figuring out what's in breach of policy and what isn't.

It's favourable to trump! THE POST YOU LINKED IS FAVORABLE TO TRUMP read it again dude.

It says that trump can now post something that they originally took down! They first thought he would need to blur some PII but then decided he wouldn't need to after the whirlwind of policy input. It was FAVORABLE to trump you dimwit