you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

Oh for fuck's sake. The dumbass crying baby now insists that I play the "no true Scotsman" game with him.

https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019

Go fuck yourself, idiot.

I already said I know what's coming next - "Waah, waah I said trustworthy"

What's the fucking point in insisting over multiple posts that I play the fucking stupid game with you.

You're a dipshit and I recognised like six posts back what stupid fucking moron game you're trying to play with the "trustworthy" qualifier. But you're sniggering to yourself that you outsmarted site_sux because you're too thick to recognise that I have addressed this multiple times already

Fucking victim complex, whining baby thinks he can chuckle and snigger when it's your own dipshittery that's caused you to miss the multiple times I've addressed it already.

Ok moron, I gave you a link, now you get to play the true Scotsman card, and ignore how you're just a sniveling wining victim-complex baby who thinks he lives under fascism while never having to worry about slavery or torture or bring locked up for his stupid sniveling speech. Get a grip you fucking child.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

This is a communist source. They are one of the guilty parties which must face the penalty of death in their role against Humanity.

Do you have a trustworthy source for your claim?

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Are you fucking stupid. Did they not cover reading yet in your preschool

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

You made a claim. Now do you have a source for that claim or are you going to surrender?

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Unless you're willing to explain upfront what kind of sources you consider trustworthy, then why the fuck would I keep playing true Scotsman with you?

You're clearly only capable of the most childish level of cognition.

Why don't you point to the goalposts before I take the shot. What is a "trustworthy" source, in your infantile view?

Surrender? Isn't that what you already did when you ignored the "fascist" rebuttal and tried to play this childish game of true scotsman with me? No I don't think it's surrender.

Let's just back up and recognise what this babyish mess of DNA is actually saying.

He's saying that the government stopped him from celebrating Christmas but he isn't aware of why.

He's saying they would only let him meet five people, but at no point, did he ask anyone what's going on or why that might be.

Do you think anyone here believes that? No, you are just showing yourself to be a big crying baby with a victim complex

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Give me an anti communist source that supports your claim of a so called "global pandemic"

You talk a lot for someone without a single source

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I have plenty. But we are still working on slowly drawing information out of your infantile mind.

But this is progress. To your childish worldview, trustworthy=anti-communist.

So a source, in your view, cannot be qualified as trustworthy, unless they meet that anti -communist standard.

Just by-the-by I do wonder how you operate your life (or just the parts that your mommy isnt taking care of) when all information is considered untrustworthy....like, when you do even the simplest things. Can you trust which milk is full fat and which is skimmed? Can you trust bus timetables and airline departures? None of these entities are anti-communist

Ok so let's see. Are there any other qualifiers that baby wants to introduce now, or just anti -communist? I don't want to pull an anti-communist source only to hear there's some other qualifier for trustworthiness. So get them out now

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I'm still waiting for your source

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Here is an extremely, rabid anti-communist source

https://www.rp.pl/covid19/art36906111-prawie-5000-nowych-zakazen-koronawirusem-w-polsce

Here's another

https://www.lidovky.cz/svet/koronavirus.K218180

Now you have to move the goalposts because you're a pathetic worm and a bad-faith debater. Remember how many chances I gave you, to add extra qualifiers up front, that you didn't take

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Please demonstrate that they're anti communist. I cannot read polish