you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

"It is a course that is taught in law school."

That grinds me gears when people say that. The Democrat Party's main talking point was that opponents don't understand CRT. That was just gaslighting.

CRT's origin as being legal theory origins are bad, it's looking at the whole legal system as being inherently racist. THAT'S why so many blacks are in jail they say.

Well, we tried not prosecuting them because it was racist, and shocker, that was a really terrible idea.

CRT in schools is the same thing, examining society and our systems, in the context of how they have been shaped by racism.

It leads to no good.

Hope there's someone besides Beto to take on Abbott.

[–]Canbot 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Thier claim is that racism against whites is not racism therfore critical race theory is not racist.

Then they claim if you say it is racist you must not understand it because it can't be racist.

Accusations of not understanding amount to ad hominems. And talking about where it started is obfuscation, because it is irrelevant. These are bad faith arguments, but a third part that hears these arguments won't know what to think.

We need to stop simply calling it racist and start quoting CRT literature that is clearly racist. We need people with kids in school to start posting these lessons online.

[–]Tiwaking 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thier claim is that racism against whites is not racism therfore critical race theory is not racist.

Yep. That is correct. They even had to go back and change the definition of racism after being caught changing it