you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]EthnocratIndependent 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

Really? You're going to make it clear that you've got a political bias, at the front of your paper?

How is that a political bias? It's an observation. CDOs do advance a leftist agenda. That's a fact.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's not related to the research. It would not appear in a scientific publication, because you have to use the space to get across your methods and findings.

But also it's fucking embarrassing if you are used to reading scholarly research:

It's alienating for some readers, it's confirming for some readers. It's wishy-washy in the sense that it's not well defined.

Low signal to noise emotional language that has no place in describing a piece of research.

[–]EthnocratIndependent 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It would not appear in a scientific publication

Well, seeing the absolute state of scientific publications in the US I'm not sure if that's a negative thing...