you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]GST893 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I think the name you are looking for is SHILL.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I was thinking more like "cum-guzzling whore", but "shill" will suffice.

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    Jason I really don't want to ban you but if you don't stop I will.

    For what?

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    For calling a shill a shill it seems. Don't speak the truth around axxa

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      Gimme a fucking break.

      There's no waking up someone like socks who worships authority and big pharma.

      I didn't advocate violence. I didn't name-call socks. I didn't even speak to him directly as I was simply stating that "some people will get on their knees and do anything for money." I think it's safe to say that cum-guzzling whores fall into that category.

      - OR -

      Are you taking the extremely biased side of socks and suggesting that Glenn Greenwald is "an opportunist journalist with no moral compass, and who has focued [sic] his whole life only on what will get to the front page" ?

      - OR -

      Do you think that I was implying that Glenn Greenwald is a cum-guzzling whore just because he's gay? If so then I suspect you have a perverted bigoted mind - and you don't know how I actually feel about the generally okay but never really ground-breaking over-revered limited hangout Glenn Greenwald.

      You aren't very clear.