you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TheJamesRocket 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

This is wonderful news. We all knew the election was stolen.

But to have concrete, official confirmation of voting discrepencys in Arizona is major. That gives real legitimacy to the claims of a stolen election.

Let the investigators go through mores batchs and more pallets. If we see repeated instances of these discrepencys, then that is irrefutable proof of election fraud!

God damn, this is awesome.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

But to have concrete, official confirmation of voting discrepancies in Arizona is major. That gives real legitimacy to the claims of a stolen election.

Um ... I've got bad news for you about this audit. It's not official confirmation of anything. It's an opaque hack by people who aren't experts funded unkown people. There were two official audits, that were transparent and bi-partizan. And done by experts. They found no fraud. And the count was accepted by the senate, so there's no going back. Making this process not only illegitimate and disorderly, but also absolutely pointless.

[–]TheJamesRocket 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Um ... I've got bad news for you about this audit. It's not official confirmation of anything. It's an opaque hack by people who aren't experts funded unkown people.

Fine, prove it.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's well enough reported.

https://apnews.com/article/elections-election-2020-business-government-and-politics-arizona-a56ee7c8214ecc876424ee3428e3ab72

Performed by "cyber ninja" with no experience in audits, but experience in spreading the misinformation about election fraud. No Democrat observers. No press observers. Not clear what they're doing. No reporting of results as they progress.