you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

All ballots were varified with an ID deemed appropriate in each state.

[–]InvoluntaryHalibut 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

Deemed by who? A Biden Harris government employee. Everone knows this was a fraud and Biden is an installed puppet of the oligarchs. Otherwise they could have audited the votes in these highly questionable corrupt voting precincts. They could have put all this to bed.

Theyve been importing “Biden/Harris voters” as fast as they can and its still not enough. All the billionaires and their MSM outlets still weren’t enough. Still had to cause an epidemic to manufacture justification to commit voter fraud. Can’t win without multiple strategies of skullduggery. Truth wouldn’t serve “Biden-Harris” because its a sham. Biden did’t want school integration because of the “racial jungle” it would cause. Biden is a rapist who penetrated a young intern against her will in a public place. Harris jokes about smoking pot while locking people up for the same. These are your working class heros— puppets of the elite who shit on the peasants.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Deemed by who?

By the traditional standards.

Should there be election reform? Sure. But the majority of voters got their choice for president, warts and all. It's that simple.

[–]InvoluntaryHalibut 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Were you saying this in 2016 when spy agencies were pushing the russian collusion hoax? Bet not.

This time there was actual fraud.

Traditional standards say gender is binary and women dont have penises. You down with traditional standards now? Across the board?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is always fraud. And electronic voting machines should be banned.

But the evidence for fraud has to be sufficient enough for an investigation. For example, a claim that: "I saw a lady rescan 100 ballots" isn't sufficient evidence, because the claim from the scanning lady is that the first scan was not read.

Cambridge Analytica helped elect Trump in 2016 by spreading disinformation. Now that disinformation is spread on websites that are popular on Saidit, some of which noted on /s/ShitpostNews

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Traditional standards meant voter verification. This was removed in the 4 key states that swung the election for Biden.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

None of the articles you linked have ANY relevance to my comment. You are trying to put up a smoke screen. Misdirection.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

So you're not reading the articles? They debunk the "voter verification was removed in key states" argument. You're welcome. What you've read before is anti-democratic.

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Every one of them. I read one again just now and it hasn't changed. You're spreading disinformation on here.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

All of them give appropriate reasons and evidence for their fact checking. Sites you are using do not do this, and indeed are spreading disinformation.

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

None of them talked about voter identification, only a higher vote count than eligible voters. I guess you think NBC is spreading disinformation. I'll keep that in mind.

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

What does "appropriate" mean to you? Many states didn't verify ID's and some went backwards with verification in general.

https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/a-big-deal-for-voting-pennsylvania-relaxes-mail-in-ballot-rules-will-no-longer-match-voters-signatures/

This is just one example.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

That's a disinformation website.

Voter ID laws differ in some counties of some states that are listed as not requiring an ID:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_identification_laws_in_the_United_States

Voter ID laws are improving in various states. A registered voter is already identified in documents at the polls, even if someone else tries to vote for that person. If someone is caught voting twice, he/she is prosecuted.

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Ha! Dan Abrams runs a disinformation site? You crack me up with your "fake news if it doesn't fit my narrative" argument. Are you saying the information in the article is not true?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Yes.

The approaches here and above are intentionally misleading, for reasons I've noted. If you think the election was "stolen", you've been mislead. If your response is "wot - it ain't true?" This isn't my "narrative"; it's backed by 80 million voters. Voter ID laws are improving.

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I am specifically talking about the rules for voter verification being changed in 2020. You are trying, as usual, to redirect.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/ballots-can-t-be-tossed-out-over-voter-signature-court-n1244585

Here's your "real news" site.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

This had a minor impact, if any, on the election

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

How do you know if there wasn't voter verification? Your opinion not based on fact. I have opinions, too, based on experience or a gut feeling.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Voter registration contains the updated ID (in most cases, +/- a few dead people). If you know somewone who is registered but is not going to vote, AND you want to risk going to jail, you could try to vote for that person without bring your ID. But people who've done this have gone to jail. Let's say you know 10 people you want to impersonate at the polling stations, you have to select times and places where the same polling volunteers won't recognize you and try to vote in those areas. Let's say there is a highly organized group that keeps track of who votes and who doesn't vote, and then tries to get others to vote for the non-voters, in specific districts, at specific times, for specific people who might not be recognized by a neighbor volunteer at the neighborhood polling station.

In all of these scenarios, the impact is at most a few hundred votes, not nearly enough to help develop a 7% majority in a country. It just doesn't work, is not worth doing, and there are cases of people going to jail who tried it.

It's easier to hack the voting machines, which is where we should look. This happens in every election.

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You are underestimating what people can and will do if they are paid enough. Also, someone voted as me in the same election as I did and the election board counted both votes, so the system is broken in that way.