you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I've seen the video. This "jogger" attacks them and attempts to take their firearm before forcing them to shoot in self defense. The nonsense you're spouting about hunting wild game is pure leftist propaganda.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So if someone is threatening you with a gun, potentially to shoot you, and you try to take the gun, then it's your fault if the person shoots you? The person who brings the gun, and then manages to kill you, is definitely guilty. If you do this to any unarmed person, your claim that this is self defense is false, because you brought a gun, pointed it at the unarmed person, and threatened to murder him, implicitly or explicitly.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

If someone has stopped me and is armed, no way in hell am I going to try to jump them and take their firearm from them. Especially if they've called the police already. I would comply with their demands. Resisting in that situation is something only a dumb criminal ape would do.

Keep in mind, performing a citizens arrest is not illegal. Assaulting someone is. Amaud is the one that assaulted the two men attempting to perform a citizens arrest, and thus the two men will walk in this case. I assume you'll be joining the rioters and burning down the cities when that happens?

[–]wristaction 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The irony here is that socks was in another thread about the carjacking/murder in DC arguing in bad faith that the Uber Eats driver should have just relinquished his car.