all 11 comments

[–]SilenceThem_Consume 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

The move comes after the county refused to allow the Senate access to election equipment, copies of ballots and other materials under a subpoena issued by lawmakers, some of whom continue to question whether Democratic President Joe Biden won.

Why would they refuse to offer the records to lawmakers?

"We must bring back confidence that the election results reported are how votes were legally cast," Fann said. "The Senate’s forensic audit will bring accuracy and detail to the process, and with that restore integrity to the election process."

Everyone should support verifying the elections - I dont get how this isnt a 10,000% nonpartisan issue.

[–]Canbot 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Democrats know it's the democrat party that is doing the vast majority of fraudulent voting. They support it so long as their side is winning. When Republicans start cheating then it will become a bipartisan issue.

[–]Zapped 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You mean, "when the Republicans win more from cheating". In my state, the Democrats used gerrymandering to keep and gain seats in the state legislature and the U.S. House. Once the Republicans gained power, the Democrats filed a lawsuit saying that it wasn't fair anymore.

[–]SilenceThem_Consume 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is a big dirty secret - the dems gerrmander just as much as the republicans do!

[–]bobbobbybob 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

orange man bad, stain on country, must be eliminated, along with undesirable terrorists. therefore audit is bad.

[–]SilenceThem_Consume 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

When trump abuses protesters, nancy pelosi calls us "a banana republic", when trumpers are abused, she stays silent. Makes you think.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We've all been thinking, and planning. And then meeting IRL.

Driving us off social media was a mistake. Face to Face is far more.... unifying.

[–]TheJamesRocket 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Its too late. Even if the investigation proved that there was fraud, it wouldn't matter. Congress would pretend it didn't exist, and so to would the media. The whole investigation would go down the memoryhole. Reality doesn't matter anymore.

[–]TheEvilNick 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

unless fraud could also prove some lower elections were stolen as well. In that case they would not be in charge of all 3 branches anymore and it would matter a lot.

[–]AnarchySpeach 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Reality has never mattered. People still think the world is flat. Unless a belief is stopped by a physical object, there is zero incentive to lose faith. 1+2=4 until they have to count something they think is important. Then it is 3. Eventually, if enough people laugh at them, using their own evidence against them in a manner that requires physical acceptance, only then will someone with strong beliefs waver in their faith.

Some refuse to acknowledge they disproved themselves to the point they accidentally start harming others. Like a doctor that thinks homoeopathy will cure their cancer patience. These people are usually put into asylums of some sort.

Others re-contextualize their beliefs into a new framework for a new faith.

The more physical proof showing undeniable facts the harder it becomes to appear sane when denying them. This allows us to differentiate between someone going along with the crowd and a dangerously delusional sycophant. The average person wants to fit in, but will walk away if things become unbearable. A cult will prevent them with threats/actions. The sycophants that crave approval from their cult leader will have no response to the facts. They will pretend the fact do not exist, even if it means hurting themselves and others, to prove their loyalty.

Every grain of sand added to the other makes it more and more difficult for the average person to join the cult. If you know they're a cult you are less likely to join them. In the long term it matters. Although, it will be many years before anything comes of these facts, if at all. At the very least it makes for some good reading when all of this inevitably gets published into a banned book someday.

[–]Zapped 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think they know, but they are either embarrassed that they screwed up so badly relaxing the mail-in rules and/or some of this is a case of "I'll wear an "R" and you'll wear a "D" so we can pretend we're not in on the same scam.