Republicans join Tulsi Gabbard on calling for U.S. to drop leak cases against Assange and Snowden

submitted by Drewski from m.washingtontimes.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Agreed. More like, the zionists tried taking her into their ranks, getting her fully on board their shenanigans by offering her positions on the CFR and those awards, up until she must have said something like "you know what, I'm not interested. AT ALL. Country before party."

And that's why she was put aside by the democrats. She is easily the most electable of them; she just isn't with the zionist-warmonger agenda.

[–]Comatoast 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

She pissed off Clinton in some way, or she was seen as a threat. I could be wrong, but she feels pretty genuine. She's impressive.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I personally see her as being the "clean" or "woke" option. I wouldn't be surprised if she found herself in a position of power in the near future. It's hard to tell with these people, they can set someone up as being an "outsider" and most of the evidence would of course support that.

In my opinion, if she had really upset someone, if she were really being independent, then she would've been run out of office.

I remember when I first heard of her. Now, my "woke" family and friends talk about her endlessly. The last time this happened, Trump got elected. I have doubts concerning Tulsi. She seems like a honeypot of some kind.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

A honeypot for reasonable people? ;-)

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I won't lie, she is one of a handful of politicians who intrigue me, in a good way. So, yes, a honeypot for reasonable people :)

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Nah, Assange was thanked by Netanyahu on twitter. Assange, if he even is in jail, (might just be one long drawn out PsyOp) was always an Israeli asset, which is why wikileaks in their term data base mentions Iran more than any other country. Snowden, or snow job is another limited hangout asset who worked for the DoD and covers up 9/11 as does Assange. His book is pathetic and never mentions Israel once. But he worked for all the neocons at the DoD including rabbi Dov Zakheim. Also, he thinks whistle-blowers "should be punched in the balls."

Real whistle-blowers are killed. Snowden and Assange were paraded on the media for specific reasons. They all play their limited hangout parts.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Oh I agree, but I'm not sure Gabbard knows all this. I think a lot of politicians are kept in the dark. Hell, Trump is probably in the dark about a lot of things even you and I know about.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I also agree with them being mostly kept in the dark. They are not masterminds like people believe. It would be safer to keep your proxies ignorant, rather than clue them in and risk a power play.