Abortionist Who Said She Cuts Baby Vocal Chords Before Abortion So They Can't Scream Loses Medical License

submitted by scrubking from thegatewaypundit.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]alkhd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

I give up, you are either trolling or you are detached from reality.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

I give up, you are either trolling or you are detached from reality.

I analysed the wording of her tweet and interpreted it logically. You are now avoiding the central point, and, you are also making claims irrelevant to the current topic.

[–]alkhd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

As I've said I think three times now.

(a) Transecting the umbilical cord kills the fetus. (b) Dead things cannot scream. (c) After the fetus is dead the abortion process begins. As it is dead it cannot scream even if a larynx has been developed.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24034582/

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I get where you're coming from but I am not talking about that. I am talking explicitly about how the wording of her tweet implies something that contradicts your statement.

Edit: Even if she clarified what she was referring to, and even if you take that into context, one statement still remains contradicted.

[–]alkhd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

What part does it contradict

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The "fetuses can't scream part". Yes, I know they can't do it scientifically, but the wording of her tweet implies something else logically.

[–]alkhd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The fetus dies in step A, there is no opportunity for it to scream after that. She meant "even if fetuses would be able to scream ... i transect the [umbilical] cord 1st, so there is no opportunity (because the fetus is dead before the abortion begins)..."

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, she meant "even if fetuses would be able to scream ... i transect the [umbilical] cord 1st, so there is no opportunity (because the fetus is dead before the abortion begins)...". She didn't have to say the first part, she could have just said "fetuses can't scream" and posted it instead of adding "even if fetuses would be able to scream". Btw /thread, I don't want to argue with you anymore in a pointless downward spiral.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Ad fucking nauseum

[–]alkhd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Indeed. Keep believing the impossible, my friend.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ok sire, enjoy your day.