Twitter Representative Admits to Flagging President Trump but Not Genocidal Leader of Iran

submitted by scrubking from thegatewaypundit.com

all 29 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]SeasideLimbs 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (37 children)

Question for those of a far-right persuasion: How does this fit into the worldview in which Big Tech and Social Media are controlled by the jews?

[–]kokolokoNightcrawler 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

First of all, which ever persuasion you are, you should be able to read the statistics without bias. Jews DO RUN and control and especially censor all major social media. Second, they are currently in the process of blowing up military and civilian installations inside Iran.

All hate tweets, threats and especially actions are welcomed by the zio scum atm because they want that war to fulfill their satanic prophecies.

Any more questions?

[–]SeasideLimbs 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Any more questions?

Yes. You said "All hate tweets, threats and especially actions are welcomed by the zio scum atm because they want that war to fulfill their satanic prophecies."

Then how come they ban everyone even remotely right-wing?

[–]kokolokoNightcrawler 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They don't want white people being ethno-centric, xenophobic and proud of our white, Christian culture because the ultimate goal is to breed us out of existence. Trump, for instance, even though he is a crazy zio shill, at the same time he loves his own white race and wishes to halt illegal and other forms of immigration. As a geopolitical ally, Trump is great for them, but he is also resisting the total Marxist takeover and therefor ruining their hundred year plans.

I understand people's confusion about all this. You have to first go and watch how Jewwish rabbi's interpret Talmud to really understand wtf is happening in America and Europe right now.

[–][deleted]  (33 children)

[deleted]

    [–]SeasideLimbs 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (32 children)

    So you can't answer my question?

    [–][deleted]  (31 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]SeasideLimbs 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (30 children)

      So in other words, you just created a narrative for yourself that cannot be refuted because whatever anybody says, you will just bring up some imagined agenda of some jewish splinter-group being the cause.

      Big Tech censoring someone who's against jews? Jews are to blame. They want nobody to be able to oppose and expose them.

      Big Tech not censoring antisemitic muslims? Jews are to blame. They want conflict for their planned war.

      Big Tech censoring jews? Jews are to blame. They want white people to believe far-left jews are part of their group. I will then declare anyone white and far-left a crypto-jew without evidence.

      Big Tech allowing antisemitic far-leftists? Jews are to blame. Those leftists are "contained" (despite literally having ejected jewish groups from large pride events, having the support of several founders of the women's march and one of the greatest far-left events in recent years, and their antisemitism having become a popular narrative among leftists) and are simply seen as a "necessary part of doing business with leftists/communists," despite the fact that's not really true at all because there's nothing in leftist ideology that necessitates that jewish people have to be seen as oppressors, given that they've enjoyed one of the most solid and popular victimhood narratives in the last century. But still. Jews to blame.

      ...Purely out of sheer curiosity, name me one action Twitter could take that you would consider counter to the idea of it being controlled by a jewish conspiracy. To make it fair, I'll give you one that would make me consider they are being run by a jewish conspiracy: if they started banning all criticism of Israel under the guise of "antisemitism," including left-wing criticism.

      [–][deleted]  (8 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]SeasideLimbs 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

        The irony.

        [–][deleted]  (6 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]SeasideLimbs 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

          Except you're wrong, because a Redditor would have already called you a nazi by now, blocked you and messaged the admins to get your account banned, whereas I asked you an actual question (whether there is one action you could name Twitter could take that you would consider running counter to the narrative that they are being controlled by a jewish conspiracy) and you decided to, ironically, do the leftist thing and go "I don't gotta engage in this emotional labor." (Not your exact words, but same idea.)

          [–][deleted]  (4 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

            Twitter could start banning people that were racist against whites and start allowing people that are alt-right on their platform. Basically if they did the opposite of what they're doing.

            Then they could start doxxing antifas and other antiwhite groups. They could deplatform woke organisations and politicians.

            They're not doing any of that

            [–]SeasideLimbs 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

            start allowing people that are alt-right on their platform

            As already argued by Yin, that would just be the work of jews trying to create conflict for them to politically abuse.

            Then they could start doxxing antifas and other antiwhite groups

            That's illegal. Unreasonable standard.

            They could deplatform woke organisations and politicians.

            Unreasonable standard when combined with your demand that it allow the alt-right on its platform. You want Twitter to become an alt-right-only shithole for it to prove itself not to be under control of a jewish conspiracy.

            could start banning people that were racist against whites

            This is the only argument I'd consider legitimate. Thank you for providing an example. Given everything else you and Yin have said, the conclusion is that people like you are demanding an unreasonably high standard for evidence countering your narrative that Big Tech is run by a jewish conspiracy while engaging in special pleading by allowing vague, unsubstantiated and unfalsifiable claims if they are in favor of that narrative.

            [–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

            "unreasonably high standard for evidence" is just doing the opposite of what they're doing and allowing/not allowing on their platform.

            By being the opposite of anti-white, they automatically become pro-white. This would be clear evidence that the anti-white narrative was a lie.

            But they're not doing any of that because its not a lie and because the narrative is true.

            Also if you noticed, it were suggestions of things they could do to prove the narrative wrong. Doing any of them, even just 1 of them, would be evidence against the narrative. But they're not doing any of them because the narrative is not wrong. Deal with it.

            [–]SeasideLimbs 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

            "unreasonably high standard for evidence" is just doing the opposite of what they're doing and allowing/not allowing on their platform.

            Unreasonably high standards for evidence in our conversation have nothing to do with Twitter and its conduct. There is no connection.

            By being the opposite of anti-white, they automatically become pro-white. This would be clear evidence that the anti-white narrative was a lie.

            Exactly. The only evidence you consider as valid evidence that Twitter is not controlled by some nebulous jewish conspiracy is if they became white supremacists. That is called an unreasonably high standard for evidence.

            Also if you noticed, it were suggestions of things they could do to prove the narrative wrong. Doing any of them, even just 1 of them, would be evidence against the narrative.

            False. I pointed out that at least one of them would be dismissed by Yin and likely by you, too. The others are unreasonably high standards and therefore prove my point that your and Yin's arguments for a supposed jewish conspiracy controlling Big Tech are illogical thanks to how they are "demanding an unreasonably high standard for evidence countering your narrative that Big Tech is run by a jewish conspiracy while engaging in special pleading by allowing vague, unsubstantiated and unfalsifiable claims if they are in favor of that narrative."

            [–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

            No, if they started banning anti-white racism that would certainly count as evidence.

            Just because you think the others are unreasonable doesn't mean they are. They are already doing those things, just against whites.

            An alternative would be to drop all censorship and let free speech reign supreme which they wont ever do because it benefits white people.

            [–][deleted]  (4 children)

            [deleted]

              [–]SeasideLimbs 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

              Oh shut up. I didn't see that you weren't the same person who wrote this post despite you responding to my response. (quote: "All hate tweets, threats and especially actions are welcomed by the zio scum atm because they want that war to fulfill their satanic prophecies.")

              [–][deleted]  (2 children)

              [deleted]

                [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                The left wants to make the United States look like Iran.

                Wonder why Iran is doing so poorly? 60% of their industry is controlled by the state (which is Socialism by definition), which is itself controlled by the Islamic elite.