you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

South Africa, Haiti, Rhodesia - all three are examples of former prosperous white nations flooded by a tidal wave of blacks and driven to economic and social ruin by incompetent black governments after their takeover. In all three, Jews played an outsized role in overthrowing the whites who built those nations. In every case did whites face mass rape, and ethnic cleansing from their new brown overlords. These three are templates for all white Western nations whose oligarchs are singularly Jewish and despise native Europeans.

[–]Agall 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Brazil aswell.

[–]Anatolia 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

how is a nation that was started by jews bringing blacks over as slaves a "white nation?" when the majority population was always black and indigenous

[–]StBlops2cel_is_Lord 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Wait..you think blacks were in Brazil before the Jewish slave trade? lol

[–]Anatolia 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

no i'm saying that the original people that moved to brazil were in numbers I believe 1 white to 10-50 blacks (slaves) thats not including indigenous people. So I just don't see why I would ever consider it a "white" nation

[–]ChancellorMershekel 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You can add Costa Rica and Argentina to that list.

Back in 1900, Argentina literally had the world's highest GDP per capita.

Nowadays no one would ever think that Argentina was ever much of anything, let alone once being the home of the world's averagely wealthiest people. What happened? Well, at least one cause is demographic change. That is, that large numbers of people left those more dysfunctional countries to Argentina's north (particularly Paraguay and Bolivia) and migrated southwards. And by the 1990s, no longer was it merely Hispanics, but large numbers of people foreign to the continent (e.g. African blacks) who were arriving en masse. Unsurprisingly Argentina—particularly population centres like Buenos Aires—now resembles those same countries that many 'new Argentinians' fled.

It seems that migration will eventually create a sort of global domino effect. That is, that if many immigrants come to Argentina, perhaps more established Argentinians will go to, say, America, to avoid the nonsense they bring. And when many immigrants come to America, perhaps more established Americans will go to, say, the UK, for the same reasons. And when many immigrants come to the UK... you get the drift. What happens when no place is appealing to migrate to? Everyone is stuck with nowhere to go. First-world peoples have to put their foot down somewhere and assert: 'This is our land, we don't want to live like the South Africans, Argentinians, and, look at this long list of people we don't want to be like, so get lost, we're full'.

[–]Trajan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why were blacks in Saint-Domingue, and what was the Jewish role in the revolt against the then authorities on the island?

Your definition of ‘white nation’ appears pretty novel if you consider a colony overwhelmingly populated by slaves to be a white nation.

[–]StBlops2cel_is_Lord 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

white nation

'run by Whites'