you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

False. Just look at what is happening in CHAZ with segregated spaces. The violent black people hate white people, not aryans, all white people. The signs don't say "no aryans allowed".

Race wars don't give a fuck about creed, or beliefs they are based only on skin color. They group all non white people together against white people simply because whites make up roughly 50% of the population.

[–]Leo_Littlebook 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Firstly, it's unclear whether you understand what "Aryan" means. It's roughly equivalent to "European", but excludes minorities such as Ashkenazies, who are obviously part Semitic. Jews are certainly not going to fight FOR Aryan heritage America. Besides Jews, I don't know who you're talking about that's white but not Aryan. Ainu?

Secondly, the fact that US blacks won't ally with anyone but themselves does not mean that the two sides will be blacks versus everyone else. Blacks are not strong enough to forge such an unlikely alliance. They are militarily insignificant except as paramilitaries operating under police protection. There will probably be more than two sides.

Your premise that race wars are based on skin color is also incorrect, e.g. Irish vs English. Skin color is an approximation, but in the USA an exception will be made to exclude Jews, due to their ongoing pattern of extreme hostility towards Aryans.

Lastly, race AND religion are the two factors that matter in an ethnically-mixed polity, and that is what we see on the ground in the USA -- a shaky alliance of Proggunist whites and anti-Aryan browns vs. barely-there federation of civnat and nationalist Aryans.

A South-American-style miscegenated vassal state can't hope to survive in a partitioned North America with a hungry Aryan-American military state looking to secure lebensraum and redress historical grievances, so this all can only end one way. Historians will describe it in terms similar to the Children's Crusade.

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

It was the Nazis who invented the word so they decide what it means. If you have a different opinion it is you who is wrong. Aryan specifically refers to Germanic and English people. Slavic people were not considered Aryan.

Religion would be used to divide us if there were two major religions with a roughly 50/50 distribution. Instead they are dividing us based on skin color because there are roughly 50% whites and 50% non whites in this country.

[–]Leo_Littlebook 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You are thoroughly wrong.

The Nazis did not invent the term Aryan. I'll skip the etymology for the proper contextual definition: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan_race

It is a useful designator that corresponds to a genetic reality visible in heat maps.

The Nazis had lots of kooky unscientific ideas and if you're fixated on preserving them in the name of "Never Again" I suggest you check your oven math.

Religion would be used to divide us if there were two major religions with a roughly 50/50 distribution.

What you miss is that in a left singularity politics becomes religion. Progressive Communism, or Proggunism, is a religion at this point, as can be observed in spectacles such as Prog whites kneeling to blacks and literally self-flagellating. Non Progs are heretics anathematized for blasphemy.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If as you say all all whites are Aryan except for a tiny amount of Jews then why muddy the water with that term? Just say white. Aryan is obviously a loaded word. Only white supremacists would call themselves Aryan.

[–]Leo_Littlebook 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Nonsense. Aryan is an accurate term, that reflects Aryan conquests to e.g. Iran and India. White supremacism is a barely existent boogeyman conjured by loxist Jews. Aryans are the only race that had the power to rule the world and declined to ruthlessly exploit it. Now they don't even have the power anymore, nor will they ever again.

And obviously, the reason to use Aryan instead of European is that Europe is a geography, not an ethnicity. The MSM labels Sudanese living in Europe as "Europeans", and in a sense they're correct. Therefore a precise ethnic label should be used to disambiguate, and Aryan is the correct term, just like Semitic. There is absolutely no reason why indigenous Europeans shouldn't have their own sub-label within Caucasian.

In the USA, it's even worse. "White" is a term used to embrace Semitics, Slavics and even some Hamitics, completely denying and obscuring the identity of heritage Americans, but with plausible correctness due to skin tone. The solution is obviously "Aryan-American".

Politically correct anthropologists tried to deprecate the term Aryan, only to have their justifications exploded by the assault of the geneticists, who disproved their pious assertions that Aryans could never have been continental conquerors.

If anti-Aryans want to erase our ethnic identity, then they can do it the old fashioned way, with bullets and blades instead of envy and lies.

[–]yellow_algebra_31 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Interesting. Have people successfully resisted this kind of division in the past? What worked?

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not that I know of, but with the internet we have the greatest chance anyone has ever had. It used to be that you had to rely on the media for all your news, and the elite controlled the news. Now they still control the news, and the schools, and all the major tech companies; but there are little niches where people can still spread ideas far wider than their local village square.