Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein had connections to the top of the US government. You will know them by their fruit...

submitted by In-the-clouds from hostux.pics

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

That's not true. Honest justice officials, who saidit would probably call deepstate witch-hunters, have been trying to get justice for trump's victims for years. So don't lie that no-one will do anything. People are trying, but they come up against the brick wall of nihilism and cynicism which you so aptly demonstrated.

For example

  1. This story is from five days ago about trump's upcoming assault trial. You can see here, the victims and their supporters WILL DO ANYTHING for justice, but vile abuser pedo trump is trying to stop it. https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/17/politics/e-jean-carroll-donald-trump-lawsuit/index.html

  2. The child who trump raped was prevented from achieving justice by the threats emanating from evil pedo trump's abuse network. If you think nothing will be done, perhaps you'd agree that whoever prevented justice from happening here should also be locked up https://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-dropped-230770

Your other point is that, you don't know whether it was early 90s president Clinton, or the most powerful man in the world and frequent lolita express flier Trump who gave the nod to kill Epstein.

Given that it happened in a federal prison, and trump was the head of the federal government, I think that he would have been the first to say if any evidence pointed to Clinton.

What did trump have to say? Did he indicate that any evidence pointed to Clinton? No, he wished Ghislaine Maxwell well, in a blatant mafia thread to ensure her silence after her partner was whacked.

You'd have to have your eyes closed to not see that all clues point to trump

[–]1Icemonkey 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Quoting Politico and CNN? Really?

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

You can quite easily point at what you think they got wrong, if that's the case.

Otherwise this is just a dumb strawman argument from a conspiritard grasping at straws. How are those straws you're grasping at, retard?

[–]1Icemonkey 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Three references to straws in one sentence. Ok, felcher.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Yeah why don't we say "scarecrow argument" instead of strawman?

When you pretended that you could just look at a publication name and decide you could discard the facts in the article - you didn't make a "scarecrow argument", you made a strawman.

It was a weak attempt by you to focus on something other than the facts at hand. That's called grasping at straws. I don't know why so many saying are straw based. Probably the people who were working around straw all day didn't have much else to do than coin new sayings or whatever.

So, returning to the matter at hand, I linked two articles which show how vile pedo abuser Donald Trump is misusing the legal system to escape justice for raping Epstein's trafficked children.

Instead of responding to the facts about sex pest 45, you decided to make a scarecrow argument. Anything to say for yourself? Did you find anything wrong or incorrect in the articles?

[–]1Icemonkey 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Why would I read that trash, so I could think like and agree with you? Why?

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's an allegation of facts not the little red book.

Pathetic that you would refuse to consider evidence against your position because of childish contrariness.

If it was really trash or brainwashing then you'd be able to point to just one thing that you think they got wrong

Just one. Should be really easy

[–]1Icemonkey 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah, I just don’t care. Everything is fake coming from both sides anymore. Very soon, with chatGPT and other AI stuff, we won’t be able to believe anything we see, read or hear. I guess I shouldn’t have said anything at all.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay but the contents of those articles aren't actually fake though