you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

White people's population literally exploded threefold due to Imperialism and are only able to sustain it because Fritz Haber invented artificial fertilizer.

Is it one or the other? You are literally contradicting yourself. Industrialized farming sustains white people. The only need for fertilizer comes from the finite amount of arable land and the absurd WORLD population. You are confusing the claim that the WORLD can't sustain the WORLD population without fertilizer, with the claim that a small fraction of the world population can't.

[–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Is it one or the other?

It's both. Imperialism increases the amount of arable land and artificial fertilizer is the only reason why they are able to maintain such population sizes. Usually, populations go up and down like a sine-wave due to availability of food and, due to the nature of Imperialism, whites are the least likely to have sustainable farming techniques and hence will deplete the soil fastest.

Hence the need for artificial fertilizer.

Industrialized farming sustains white people.

Haber Process

Also see above.

claim that the WORLD can't sustain the WORLD population without fertilizer

That claim is absurd because indigenous people have lived in those places for generations and would hence have learned to not deplete the soil like a dipshit Imperialist. This also applies to pre-Imperialism Europe, before kikes and Imperialists fucked everything with mass soil-depleting farming techniques like the aforementioned "industrialized farming"...which necessitates the Haber Process.

Do you remember the Bengal Famine? It was because the Imperialist British literally forced Bengal Indians to plant Opium. The world can sustain its own population - it just cannot do so under Imperialist rule.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

It's both.

Illogical. If imperialism allowed for a trippling of the population then artificial fertilizers are obviously not necessary.

whites are the least likely to have sustainable farming techniques and hence will deplete the soil fastest.

Literally disprove by history. White people had the best farming techniques, and invented crop rotation and selective breeding.

That claim is absurd because indigenous people have lived in those places for generations and would hence have learned to not deplete the soil like a dipshit Imperialist.

Yeah, they starve every year and it keeps thier population low. It has nothing to do with knowledge as they never even figured out crop rotation.

[–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

If imperialism allowed for a trippling of the population then artificial fertilizers are obviously not necessary.

It's about sustainability of population increase. Imperialism triples your population but does not do it in a sustainable way. The fact that you are making this argument in the first place shows that your IQ is truly one standard deviation below mine.

Literally disprove by history. White people had the best farming techniques, and invented crop rotation and selective breeding.

Even Native Americans rotated crops you dipshit, crop rotation is literally baby shit. If you are proud of "crop rotation" one might wonder how "advanced" you really are.

Selective breeding also existed long before Darwin. In fact, wild horses don't even exist today - it's just all feral horses.

Yeah, they starve every year and it keeps thier population low. It has nothing to do with knowledge as they never even figured out crop rotation.

Yet you can't back that up. I'm pretty sure you Irish trash starve every year, though.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Imperialism triples your population but does not do it in a sustainable way

Imperialism is the holding and taxing of foreign lands. That is very much sustainable.

Even Native Americans rotated crops you dipshit,

Native Americans were foragers you dipshit. They learned farming from the settlers.

Selective breeding also existed long before Darwin.

Ok, and? Do you think this somehow changes the fact that white people used it to create better crops? Do you even know what you are trying to argue?

Yet you can't back that up.

Really? You want to argue that food scarcity doesn't keep populations low?

[–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Imperialism is the holding and taxing of foreign lands. That is very much sustainable.

Nope. Just use your pea-sized brain for one second.

Native Americans were foragers you dipshit. They learned farming from the settlers.

Where the fuck did you learn your history? From Jew Schools?

Ok, and? Do you think this somehow changes the fact that white people used it to create better crops? Do you even know what you are trying to argue?

Do you think people didn't know how to select for grains they like? Basic shit.

Really? You want to argue that food scarcity doesn't keep populations low?

Population density was high in both China and India. Europe had the lowest population density pre-Imperialism.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Where the fuck did you learn your history? From Jew Schools?

I got that directly from native American text books. Oh wait, those don't exist because THEY WERE LITERALLY ILLLITERATE.

[–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You underestimate the low-IQ mind's ability to perform crop rotation without achieving literacy. Don't worry though, literally everyone underestimate the subhuman 60 IQ nigger's ability to perform crop rotations. Crop rotations isn't rocket science, hell a monkey can probably do it.