Italy Is Forcing HALF A MILLION People Out Of Their Jobs And The Prime Minister Is Unpersoning Them: "The Unvaccinated Are Not Part Of Our Society"

submitted by CleverFoolOfEarth from (notthebee.com)

all 22 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]magnora7 15 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

Creepy.

WEF training apparently has taught them to infinitely double-down on this covid power-grab stuff, even though the science isn't aligned with them at all anymore. It looks like they want to cause massive revolutions and instability. And build public distrust as deeply as possible, not just in the figureheads but in the entire institution of government. Then people will clamor for a new institution and the WEF and the next wave of trainees will have the solution ready to deploy. Semi-global governance, potentially backed by a cryptocurrency. That's how it looks anyway.

What most western governments are doing right now is not sensible or science-based. They're trying to piss people off. They're trying to create the trucker convoys and ensuing revolution, and ensuing breakdown of institutions which clears the way for new institutions to take their place. This isn't a "whoopsie" overreach like most people think, this is an intentional agitation to generate larger-scale protests. Remember the intelligence-agency-created "Arab Spring"? Or the "Color revolutions" in soviet satellite countries? Now those tactics have come home to roost in the western world, it seems.

[–]FlippyKing 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

good points.. "Out of chaos, order" is the mantra, and they make the chaos and enforce the order. They offer the only choices they let us see.

[–]magnora7 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Precisely. Ordo ab chao, the Freemason slogan.

Combined with the old "Problem, reaction, solution" setup, where they create the problem guide the public reaction via the media and then sell you the solution, it is quite a potent force.

I think every person needs to truly wrap their minds around these concepts and how others are abusing them, before humanity can rise to a higher level of wisdom. This is what should be taught in school, because it's what drives our world.

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

I think one important point is that all these problems are far off from us, and we're made frightened of them by theater (TV, radio, internet). We really need to push off the yoke of these distant masters, stop sending them food, stop pretending they have anything to do with us at all besides what they take or we give them, and commit to our local communities. Yes, I'm a hypocrite here on Saidit (thank you for building it), but ... I don't want to sound crazy running around to all my neighbors talking about growing turips and learning to like eating them or at least eating them in spite of hating them, or who will raise the chickens, where the cows will go, how do we run a water system, and all that.

[–]Ehhhhhh 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Whats wrong with raising chickens? Wouldn't that be something to do within your local community?

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I don't want to run around to all my neighbors talking about it. It's a great idea, a good bit of set up work to build good coops and keep foxes out, keep them fed and warm enough in the winter, keep roosters and control the pairings so we can get eggs and future chickens, have enough so there's a healthy and sustainable gene pool. They eat bugs and provide poop to be composted. They're fun to watch.

Same with all live stock. They each provide multiple benefits, require good planning and set up for not so very stressful but very stead and not to be ignored maintenance and vigilance. Communities could produce their own eggs, and wool, and composted manure, with just a bit of work.

[–]Ehhhhhh 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Ok. I agree that chickens are good and beneficial, but seems to be a disconnect or contradiction between saying to focus on local communities, yet then you not wanting to focus on your local community.

Not sure what point you are making.

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Without a doubt it is a contradiction on my part, a hypocrisy even. I do grow food each season and keep herbs in doors in winter, started smashing clam shells for compost/soil amendments. I have two neighbors I can easily talk to about it actually. I need to break that ice and just do it. I guess I want to have the perfect looking yard with everything running like clock work before I dare raise the idea-- that and having the money to invest in the building that will be involved. The money has to be first.

Have you done this? Any tips?

[–]Ehhhhhh 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

A little bit on raising food. I hope to do better this year and get chickens and quail again.

I started losing my chickens last time due to predators (coon or skunks, I think) but couldn't trap because I had some pets that I was worried about getting in. Kept catching cats in the live trap and chickens kept disappearing. I need a better enclosure for them to keep them safe at night.

Something that I have done is to barter with folks or trade extra eggs or rabbit poop for veggies. Have a couple of friends that share extra stuff from their gardens. Just doing that at first helps to break the ice and make small talk about gardening/raising animals. If you come across ones that are truly interested, then exchange tips and even produce, etc eventually.

Also, you don't have to be an expert. Sometimes it helps for others to see what you have in progress and can give them the confidence to try themselves. Just talk about health benefits at first (no hormones, antibiotics, pesticides, gmo, etc) and you won't come off as some "crazy prepper" to some.

Thats a way of breaking the ice and seeing who might be actually interested in being more self sufficient.

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes, I agree with the just do it idea. I try, and fail, to jump in with all pistons firing and metaphorical-guns ablazing just because I know there will always be things unexpected.

I'm surprised cats were being the predators. The farm I used to get my food at had cats and chickens and they didn't really bother each other. They walked past each other like it was nothing. Same with their dog. Also, I did not think raccoons or skunks would be predators.

Part of me speaking about it here, and being open about my failures in that regard, is to get me to at somepoint step and do it. You asking me about it is what I need.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We really need to push off the yoke of these distant masters

Agreed. It's kind of funny how much people let TV people control their lives, even though they've never met them.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What most western governments are doing right now is not sensible or science-based. They're trying to piss people off. They're trying to create the trucker convoys and ensuing revolution, and ensuing breakdown of institutions which clears the way for new institutions to take their place.

Hurry up and crash the economy, so we can blame you for it.

Also, I'm pretty sure it's illegal to discriminate based on age.

Just kidding. The rule is law no longer applies to govts.
They know it. Some of us haven't realized it yet.

They can use the law against you, but it doesn't work well against them.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Covid-19 is not a Pandemic... it's a "syndemic" || The "securitization" Nexus

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32000-6/fulltext

From the Club of Rome’s book: “The First Global Revolution”

“Ah love! Could thou and I with fate conspire, to grasp this sorry scheme of things entire, would not we shatter it to bits and then, remold it nearer to the heart’s desire?” — Edward Fitzgerald, 'The Rutalyat of Omar Khayyam'

The entire ethos is written in the book to “Limits to Growth” called “The First Global Revolution. In the pages before even the foreword, they quote the aforementioned verse from “The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam”

The NEXUS: A Full Explanation of the Construction of COVID

What we are experiencing, today, is the shattering of the ‘existing scheme’ as wished for by the Prince, while the ‘remoulding’ is sold to us in the slogan, "BUILD BACK BETTER” Also in the same book, the Prince’s father – the Greek Prince who wished to return as a deadly virus no less – is quoted:

“No generation has ever liked its prophets, least of all those who point out the consequences of bad judgment and lack of foresight. The Club of Rome can take pride in the fact that it has been unpopular for the last twenty years. I hope it will continue for many years to come to spell out the unpalatable facts and to unsettle the conscience of the smug and the apathetic.” — Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh Message to the Twentieth Anniversary Conference of The Club of Rome Paris 1988

Now, the reader must also recognise the “coincidence” that the present Prince of Wales commenced his environmental crusade the very same year as the formation of the Club of Rome – 1968.

There are no ‘coincidences’! Anyhow, to progress: I read, last year, the Lancet’s Chief Editor, Richard Horton, making the point that “Covid 19 is not a pandemic”, in which, he states that no vaccine will help. And I will repeat this link, see here, READ IT: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32000-6/fulltext

He goes on to say that it is a “syndemic”. Read the link to understand what he means by that.

While many will never have heard of the term “syndemic” before, as you can see below, the idea was suggested, in 2013, that we may well see such in the near future. Now why would they think this? Well, it’s very simple. The “Climate Change” narrative of polar bears and ice caps along with sea level changes was not capturing the public’s and businesses attention. They needed a ‘shock’ and lo and behold, they got it! How convenient, huh? A little like PNAC in the 90s saying they needed a New Pearl Harbor.

See photo: https://earthlinggb.files.wordpress.com/2021/11/screenshot-2021-10-30-at-01.06.38.png

Further, the ‘threat’ was consistently having to be put back into later and later decades (it was all meant to manifest during the 2000’s, then it was the 2010’s while now, they are saying 2040/2050’s. Why? Because it never was, or is, coming. It’s fear only and that fear is to get you to believe that they need to entirely destroy the economic, political and social fabric to then “remould it nearer to their heart’s desire." In other words, "Order out of Chaos."

However, due to the failure of the “speech acts” and “securitisation” of the “Climate Change threat” based upon the narrative of polar bears etc, it was imperative they conjured up another, more imminent and dramatic threat which directly impacted all of us and which could be linked to “climate change”. That was (and is) infectious diseases.

See photo: https://earthlinggb.files.wordpress.com/2021/11/screenshot-2021-11-06-at-01.57.08.png

“Speech Acts and Securitisation”? What the hell are they?

Well, they are TOOLS. While they had to feed you a new narrative for “Climate Change” they also had to protect that narrative from criticism. In normal, every day politics and media, everything is up for debate. However, when something is “securitised” by a “Speech Act”, it’s like a huge padlock has been applied which disallows any counter narrative, debate or criticism or just. plain disbelief to be cited by anyone on the veracity of the fundamental narrative. Yes, you can debate masks and even the need for vaccines and whether kids should be in school etc etc etc etc. That’s all fine and why?

Because you haven’t questioned the fundamental and that is what they need desperately to protect and preserve. They can deal with everything else through steering debate and providing statistics etc BUT if the fundamental was shown to be a lie, they could do none of it.

Let me put this very simply:

  • YOU are an audience.

  • THEY are the Actors.

  • THEY make “Speech Acts” just as an actor does on stage (they ARE on stage, effectively).

  • THEY need you to believe their speech act so they present you with personalities from Chris Whitty to David Attenborough and Bill Gates to Tony Fauci who they know you consider “authoritative” voices.

  • THEY give you Boris Johnson and the “we are at war” narrative both, to scare you and to make you think “we’re all in this together and we all have to chip in old sport”.

  • YOU, however, have to accept the narrative for them to then implement the measures they could never have implemented without the narrative being accepted by the public.

  • THEY, however, ensure you, the public, do not get the full picture nor do you get a balanced view of whether that fundamental narrative is real or not.

  • That is why people who try to speak out are chastised and dismissed or demonised.

  • YOU, therefore, have accepted the narrative and acted accordingly in your compliance with the directives.

“Securitisation Theory” is a subset of International Relations.

See photo: https://earthlinggb.files.wordpress.com/2021/11/screenshot-2021-11-08-at-16.59.30.png

Securitisation is a well researched, understood and used method of creating a threat out of something which may not be a threat at all. It is not, necessarily, an objective threat but is “socially constructed”. It is socially constructed by the Actor who makes the “speech act” and by the audience who accepts the ‘threat’.

Here’s a VERY simple example of a “speech act”:

You’re 16 and at school in the playground. One of your friends approaches you and whispers in your ear:

“You better deal with Jimmy right now or he’s going to get his mates together and they’re going to beat you up after school.”

That is, essentially a speech act by your friend, an “actor”, and you have to decide whether you believe that narrative he’s telling you, or not. You’re the audience and you are also what is known as the “referent object” which is the object which requires protection from the impact of the “threat” which is Jimmy and his mates.

Now, the reality could be that your friend simply hates Jimmy and knows you have the potential of giving him a good beating and that Jimmy has no intention of beating you up after school with his mates. However, your friend is a “friend” and, as such, you view him as an ‘authoritative voice’ because he wouldn’t tell you a lie, would he?

So you accept his speech act; Jimmy gets a pounding yet he was totally innocent. There was no conspiracy between him and his mates to beat you up.

The above is exactly what has transpired with Covid 19. There is no threat but your “friends”, Bill Gates and Boris and Chris Whitty and Prince Charles etc etc., are all ‘whispering in your ear’ that Covid is going to get you because climate change is having the effect of introducing more and more infectious diseases into our lives UNLESS WE DEAL WITH IT NOW!

To further get a feel for how long this agenda has been worked on, here are a series of articles, the first from Chatham House no less – The Royal Institute of International Affairs (I hope I don’t need to explain who these people are?) dated 1st September 2019.

See photo: https://earthlinggb.files.wordpress.com/2021/11/screenshot-2021-11-08-at-16.37.24.png

See photo: https://earthlinggb.files.wordpress.com/2021/11/screenshot-2021-11-08-at-16.38.34.png

Read the entire article here:

https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2021/11/17/the-nexus-a-full-explanation-of-the-construction-of-covid/

Photos

Limits to Growth” graph by the Club of Rome/MIT:

https://earthlinggb.files.wordpress.com/2021/11/0f85daa37ff4d7ab9a8c6b5a00ad1d3d29d6baee.jpeg

[–]ROK 10 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

I feel a convoy coming on ;)

[–]CleverFoolOfEarth[S] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Honk honk and may freedom be with you, my Italian brothers

[–]Dr_Bukkake 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The NFL stopped the pandemic this past Sunday. All the Hollywood elites showed us that it’s over.

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

And he's not part of the fascist party

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You would think pfizer would ask him to slow his roll a bit, making the jab sound like the mark of the beast can't be good for marketing.

[–]Feldheld 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A guy like this deserves nothing less than the death penalty.

[–]RandumbZer0 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Mussolini 2.0 needs to go?