you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ShalomEveryone 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Fake news, the website with the data made no mention of the sample size. There is no mention of if the people were selected at random or if they intentionally selected because they live in heavily republican districts throughout the country. A guy who described himself as fervently against BLM asked for a source of the information so he can show real data and not a simple chart based off of no legitimate data.

Cooling with Coolidge

@CoolidgeBCoolin

4h Replying to @mikeswriting

Can you source me this? I'm fervently against BLM, I want to be able to show real data and not just a chart to my peers. Thanks!

Shalom

✡️

[–]StrategicTactic 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

It made no mention of sample size because it says exactly how many responded to the poll in the screenshot. 238,941 responses to their online poll. They were not selected by a company or group, but self-selected, as it is an online poll.

[–]ShalomEveryone 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

238,941 responses to their online poll.

Oh!? An online poll? My mistake, we all know how scientific and reliable online polls are.

Shalom

✡️