you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Velocity 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Like OMG! Ru Srs??? Natural News??

Maybe Buzzfeed and Snopes is more geared toward someone like you with limited critical thinking skills.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Just because I know that the infowars world is bullshit, doesn't mean I drink the Jimmy Dore Koolaid.

[–]Velocity 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

What sources do you trust then?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Depends. You can trust most TV News programs when they tell you what the temperature was outside. You can't trust a weight loss product, unless it is drink water instead of soda. When I distrust something political, it isn't because someone else political told me they were wrong. Example: The infowars world is anti-vax. Older family members of mine were in terror over their kids contracting polio. Then the polio vaccine came out. Now, polio is almost eradicated. I know the polio vaccine had problems, but polio really was worse. When you collect good data on vaccines, the math shows nearly definite efficacy. Liar politicians will eventually contradict reality several times and you know to abandon their leadership. But our best critical thinking doesn't always get it right. That doesn't mean we should join the Jehovah's Witnesses.

[–]Velocity 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Most all news is affected by money and sponsorship. So much like your weight loss product example, even the most seemingly dry and unbiased news source can often be affected by outside influences. Thus circumspect to suspicion.

When you collect good data on vaccines, the math shows nearly definite efficacy.

Now show us the independent 3rd party analysis of the data, not those who make this determination with a conflict of interest.$$$

Then the polio vaccine came out. Now, polio is almost eradicated. I know the polio vaccine had problems, but polio really was worse.

Just like Pharma says about Autism. Correlation is not causation!

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No. Vaccines nearly killed off polio. The only people who still get polio are stupid ass mulsims. Its like you want sharia law, only without calling it sharia law.