all 29 comments

[–]Drewski 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

What the fuck

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Get the rope!

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fucking breitbart.com being breitbart.com

[–]ReeferMadness[S] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

The course text suggests that teachers should have their students observe kids at playgrounds and daycare for sexual behaviour. Or rather anything an adult could construe as sexual behaviour.

Presumably that bullshit is then reinforced the same way a child who does not "feel" like they are the right gender has their bullshit reinforced and solidified.

They are literally grooming pedophiles.

[–]TheBeefBenson 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not saying there aren't nefarious agendas at work in the education system but the aim of this training seems to be teaching staff to recognise behaviour in children that would indicate they've faced sexual abuse. It's doing the opposite of what people are accusing it of doing.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No - it's literally bullshit.

[–]ReeferMadness[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Well of you say so I guess I'm convinced.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My reply to your comment further below.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

homosexuality, trans gender, the slippery slope.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Ban lgbtqp now!

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

You can't move back up a slippery slope, you have to ride it all the way to the bottom. In 100 or 500 years, after this current western civilization has collapsed under the weight of it's own perversion and entitlement, a new simpler one will rise that is not plagued by all this insanity. At least that is what has happened for the past 5000 years.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I hope it happens in less than 100 years :(

[–]oneinchterror 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

/u/anescapee is a deluded lolbert. He has no idea what he's talking about. It's likely will see radical change within our lifetimes; certainly within this century.

[–]bobbobbybob 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

how very UNESCO childhood sexuality curriculum of them

Anyone who thinks this is unacceptable should note that this shit is being brought in worldwide.

[–]sproketboy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

WTF

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Ok, on one hand that's pretty fucked up, but on the other it was just passive observation in an attempt to collect scientific data. Hopefully.

[–]ReeferMadness[S] 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

It's normalizing adults staring at children looking for signs of sexual behaviour. The brain has a funny way of seeing what you want to see. Innocent playfulness is inevitably going to be interpreted as sexual. This retarded shit is going to be used to justify pedophilia the same way undeveloped children's toy preferences are used to justify castrating them with hormone blockers.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

What normal human being isn't against pedophilia though? Nearly all people are not OK with that.

I do agree the data will most likely be used in a questionable manner to justify a stupid position.

[–]ReeferMadness[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You must live under a rock. NAMBLA exists. Pedophiles exist. Guys like Polanski get awards while being aided in running from the law for raping children. Guys like Saville are allowed to prey on children while the media and everyone else who knows do nothing if not cover it up. Tech giants like Twitter and Facebook allow safe haven for pedophiles to network while having developed the software to systematically remove anti gay, anti trans, and anti pedo speech.

[–]ReeferMadness[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

It is only in western countries that pedophilia is reviled to any extent. In the middle east soldiers are literally ordered to look the other way on matter of child sexual abuse. Stories have come out about soldiers being demoted for having resuced a preteen boy who was chained to an Iraqi commander's bed as a sex slave.

Bacca Bazi is not the practice of having little boys belly dance. It is literally child prostitution.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It is only in western countries that pedophilia is reviled to any extent.

Parents of every culture protect their children from predators whenever possible.

You are making excuses for optimistic pedos in times of war.

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think you meant opportunistic, but the practice of Bacca Bazi is not new or exclusive to wartimes.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No - it's a minor comment in a minor section of a book that's taken way out of context by the pedophiles at breitbart.com

[–]ReeferMadness[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Please tell me the proper context so I can understand how having adults observe children at play, looking for things to suggest that the literal todlers are motivated by sexual desires, is appropriate.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not suggested as regular paranting process; it's an approach to understanding human behaviour, of which there are many. It's also not new. Sociiopathology is also studied among children in their first years, but this is not something recommended for all parents. It's part of a clinical consideration, of which there are many for examining behaviour. There is a field of psychology devoted to this that everyone in that field understands rather well, and that includes the study of children. All of the data is examined together, and one or two data points are not significant in that kind of study. So a criminally corrupt asshat at brietbart thought it would be fun to take a clinical study out of the classroom context (hence the textbook) and state that all parents are supposed to focus on one data point (approaches to sexual organs at a young age) about their children and apply their own ideas to their observations. This is exactly NOT what to do with that information (which is for clinical assessment, and is considered alongside many other data points). Fuck brietbart.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

on the other it was just passive observation in an attempt to collect scientific data.

For the pedos who pretend infants understand the concept of sex...

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Are the Lizard People involved in this? I bet they are.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You mean big nosed (((people)))

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Do (((I?)))

Does the punctuation go inside or outside the echo? Do you people have some sort of style guide? Would the guidelines be enforced by some sort of (I dunno) grammar Nazi?