Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted to Kill Babies - More Babies Will Live Without Her

submitted by Trump_WG1WGA from usasupre.me

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]flush_the_turd 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Bullshit take.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You are not even refuting any of my points.

So an unborn child is not an individual organism, not a different human than the mother? Babies can survive even after 21 weeks in the womb outside:

https://www.lifenews.com/2020/06/24/born-at-21-weeks-youngest-surviving-premature-baby-in-the-world-now-heading-home/

Is that baby a part of the mother's body? If you can kill the baby at that age while its in the womb, then logically you should be allowed to kill it when it is outside of the womb, there is no difference.

If a mother can kill her unborn child, can she kill her child that is born then? Yes or no?

Do you actually know the process of abortions? It involves using a vacuum to violently destroy the fetus, and it later stages, ripping the baby limb from limb and crushing their head, and at the latest stages, killing the baby by injecting poison in them. That is what abortions are. Violent killing of a life.

[–]Comatoast 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That infant has an extremely high likelihood of suffering from long-term health problems.

The advocation for termination of a very much not viable fetus during the first trimester still stands. Especially when the rate of spontaneous abortion at that point is high enough as it is. A pregnancy at that point can be terminated by pill alone.