you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FediNetizen 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

Dude's a racist, I've tried arguing with him in the past. Thinks black people should be grateful for slavery because it brought them to America. No surprises with that username.

[–]Zahn 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (11 children)

Calling people racist doesn't have the effect you would like to think it does.

[–]FediNetizen 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

You think I'm throwing the word racist around because I expect saiditers to shrivel up at the accusation or something? I'm not some west coast libtard living in a bubble, dude.

No. I'm saying the guy is a racist because, 1) he is, and 2) I'm pointing out he doesn't care about the facts because the man has an agenda.

[–]Zahn 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Slandering someone as a racist doesn't negate a premise. If you can't view your opponent with some modicum of humanity without resorting to slurs, you are then engaging in the same behavior you assume "racists" are guilty of.

[–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Slandering someone as a racist

Slander? Way to not understand what words mean. Maybe you missed it the first time, so I'll repeat myself: I've had arguments with this guy before. It's a statement of fact based on prior experience. Or maybe you'd like to explain to me how this isn't racist. I'm all ears for this one.

[–]Zahn 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Your original comment implied a sense of being dismissive because he is a just a "racist", replace that word with nigger or kike, then you and him are fundamentally behaving the same, just on an opposing spectrum.

[–]america_first_1776[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I love how this anti-white cuck went onto a post where a BLACK BLM SUPPORTER WAS LITERALLY KNEELING ON A BABY'S NECK just to troll white people who posted any kind of concern... then he goes around calling other people "racist."

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

just to troll white people who posted any kind of concern

You and Truth seem to be taking an extended break. I hope you guys learn to appreciate each other and eventually get back together.

I called that guy a piece of shit. I also said he should go to jail. I did that in that thread. Claiming I was trolling people "who posted any kind of concern" is a load of shit. One guy said "Wow, I really don't understand why nobody respects african "americans", when they do such upstanding and valiant things as this.", which isn't "posting any kind of concern", it's just him mouthing off about black people in general because of the actions of one jackass. Another guy said "if you support any person who is black, you will very quickly be supporting violent gangs", and I replied with a simple OK boomer.

But of course, you don't seem to care about actual facts too much, you just jump on whatever "facts" affirm your worldview. A few days ago it was "most people who were lynched weren't black" (they were) and "white supremacy is an anti-white lie (it isn't). Now it's that this guy was a communist (he wasn't) who shot at the driver first (he didn't, although if it does turn out he pointed his gun at the driver then I'll concede it's still a case of legitimate self-defense).

Hopefully you and Truth get back together sometime because being wrong this much seems like it should be exhausting.

[–]america_first_1776[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

One guy said "Wow, I really don't understand why nobody respects african "americans", when they do such upstanding and valiant things as this.", which isn't "posting any kind of concern", it's just him mouthing off about black people in general because of the actions of one jackass.

There is such a thing as noticeable patterns, idiot. It's not just "one jackass" who is beating on whites.

Another guy said "if you support any person who is black, you will very quickly be supporting violent gangs", and I replied with a simple OK boomer.

Wow, you're so fucking original. You should try this site called "Reddit" sometime. I'm sure they'd love you and your witty humor

"white supremacy is an anti-white lie (it isn't)

There is no such thing as white supremacy. You never proved there was because you know damn well there isn't.

Now it's that this guy was a communist (he wasn't) who shot at the driver first (he didn't, although if it does turn out he pointed his gun at the driver then I'll concede it's still a case of legitimate self-defense).

I edited my original comment to say exactly that. Because my stance changed with the facts provided to me. Unlike you, who actually has an anti-white agenda.

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Your original claim was that I was an anti-white cuck troilling whites posting any kind of concern. I posted the actual comments to show you were full of it, which you were.

And no, I don't have an anti-white agenda, just an anti-racist agenda. If you think that makes me anti-white, well that says more about you than it does about me.

[–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What determines whether or not you are a racist is your beliefs and behavior, and is entirely within your control. It's perfectly fair to make value judgements with regards to someone's character on that basis. That is in contrast to your ethnicity, which you can't control, and shouldn't be judged by.

And you are correct, I was being dismissive, because his is just a racist.

[–]Zahn 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's dehumanizing, and you are engaging in the same behavior as he is. And in some ways there is enough research to strongly suggest generally "racist" beliefs are ingrained in the human psyche. So in some sense, he can't entirely help the way he is. Though admittedly, he could work on his communication style a little bit.

You are here:

"He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster . . . when you gaze long into the abyss the abyss also gazes into you”

― Nietzsche

We never stopped the human tendency toward mobs, inquisitions and witch hunts. The years, names and ideologies have changed is all. Our capacity to commit to an encompassing sense of self righteous behavior and allegiance to ephemeral concepts that seem to justify all types of atrocious conduct.