So not only did you shift the goalpost from "a publicly funded institution denying a taxpayer service is always bad" to "a publicly funded institution denying a taxpayer service is only bad if it's life threatening". Great.

No I didn't. This is idiotic to even suggest.

I posted of a woman being denied a LIFE SAVING operation due to deadly complications with her miscarriage, and the subsequent paragraph I posted afterwards.

Perhaps you shouldn't have led with the sex-change op story. I did go back and read that Huff Po article. It's a complete disaster. They've clubbed out the nuance and fail to give any real details (mercifully, I might add, I've been through a miscarriage with my ex-wife and would rather not read about one in detail but I would). That article reeks of agenda, and the fact that it is so light on details does not lend credibility to the author. If anything, attempting to use that article at all is more proof that you're not able to examine this with a critical eye.