Anybody who denies the sexual nature and history of drag shows is a liar. And anybody who lies about the sexual history and nature of drag shows while promoting them for children is a groomer.

submitted by Chipit from (cdn.locals.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

My comment gave supporting evidence, which is "counter argument". You have responded with "contradiction". This is dragging down the discussion on the pyramid of debate, and against saidit values.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Since when do you ever follow the pyramid of debate? You literally just used insults.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Once you used insults like "liar", you successfully dragged the discussion down to your level.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Liar isn't an insult, it's a statement of fact. Anybody who denies the sexual nature and history of drag shows is a liar.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What's your best evidence of that?