you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (34 children)

Yes. These women were married with kids, too. The whole “women never worked in the olden days” line is a total lie.

[–]Comatoast 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (30 children)

It's even shittier to think that they had to contribute to a system financially that they weren't even allowed to vote in.

If I can't vote, I'm certainly not going to fucking work to pay taxes.

[–]Dragonerne 7 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 6 fun -  (18 children)

If I can't vote, I'm certainly not going to fucking work to pay taxes.

Women are short sighted, self centered and easily manipulated by propaganda. Why do you think giving women the vote is a bad idea?
Women cluelessly vote big government because the government promises them wealth transfer from men to women. "More money, me happy".
Women cluelessly vote for mass immigration out of naivity. "Me get instagram likes, me happy"
Women cluelessly vote for deconstruction of traditions that uphold civilization. "Me more free for 1-2 generations, me happy"
Etc.

Giving women the vote is a fatal mistake by men.

But women all across the west will get a taste of their desired freedom soon enough as civilization crumbles because of them.

Feminism is a disease. The only cure is for men to cut out any feminist woman from their lives.

[–]Comatoast 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (17 children)

Then fuck men exclusively and learn to eradicate women. Tada.

[–]Dragonerne 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

There are plenty of lovely women that aren't feminists. But yeah if all women were feminists, I'd rather fuck men than them.

The thing is; women are lovely and they deserve better than islam and they deserve better than being treated like property and sold as slaves. However feminists don't deserve that. Feminists deserve all the evil consequences of their ideology.

[–]Comatoast 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Women deserve to not be sold in slavery regardless of their ideology.

Who is socializing the women in your countries to care more about the fighting age men coming over in droves than about the women and children in their own country and their safety? Who is convincing those women that feminism is ignoring blatant red flags and endangering themselves and their children?

[–]Dragonerne 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

Women deserve to not be sold in slavery regardless of their ideology.

No. Feminists deserve to feel the consequences of their ideology. White men wont risk their lives to rescue them.

Who is socializing the women in your countries to care more about the fighting age men coming over in droves than about the women and children in their own country and their safety? Who is convincing those women that feminism is ignoring blatant red flags and endangering themselves and their children?

It doesn't matter who is at fault. Reality will hit feminists like a cold wet shower and I'll enjoy the show.
It's not even just islam.
Watch this video:
https://twitter.com/AfSChristian/status/1286709360673030146

She is promoting a destructive agenda designed to ruin the Swedish society. When she's called out, she calls them names and act like she's the victim. Obviously a white man comes to her rescue, for now.
Moral of the story: She's a degenerate that deserve every evil consequence of her insane ideology.

99% of all feminists act like her and they deserve nothing but islamic slavery.

[–]Comatoast 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Ugh. You fucking retard, it's not just liberal feminists. They don't make up enough of your voterbase to entirely change your laws and governments alone. Stop gobbling your own dong in self righteousness for 20 seconds and take some responsibility for the shitty men that cuck out.

[–]Dragonerne 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

Most men don't cuck out. Some do, most don't.
The opposite is true for women.

[–]Comatoast 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Because we're socialized to be kind. Who is giving the propaganda to bring in the refugees? Is it just the women enforcing it?

[–]72ndGender 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Or just do what I did, and find an attractive woman that isn't a retarded feminist.

[–]Comatoast 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Would she be thrilled with having her rights revoked? Are you considering women that want the right to vote for things that matter to them and their children, their communities all to be retarded feminists?

[–]EuropeanAwakening 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Feminism is a shit test from women. That's all it is. Kindly, fuck off.

[–]Comatoast 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

MGTOW is a shit test from men. Everything is a shit test in this place that is a shit fest. Let it burn.

[–]72ndGender 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

No one wants their rights revoked, so that's a pointless question and unrelated question. So was your second question, actually. Are you responding to the wrong person, or just letting your emotions take over for you?

[–]Comatoast 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

It's getting extremely difficult to keep up with who is talking about who and in what context. There has been a lot of discussion involving women in general having rights being a bad thing, and I am admittedly immediately on the defense. If I'm misunderstanding what you're saying and confusing you with someone else, I do apologize.

[–]72ndGender 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Well i apologise for my bad attitude, and I'm happy to clarify. I'm a libertarian, meaning I believe in egalitarianism. I'm absolutely certain that feminism is against both of these ideologies, and I will never support feminism for that reason. I married a woman who denounces feminism, and accepts egalitarianism. I think there are many women out there like her too.

[–]Comatoast 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Oookay, yep. We just had a massive misunderstanding. My original smartass reply about just telling a user to fuck men, etc. was an assblasted response to him saying:

Women are short sighted, self centered and easily manipulated by propaganda. Why do you think giving women the vote is a bad idea? Women cluelessly vote big government because the government promises them wealth transfer from men to women. "More money, me happy". Women cluelessly vote for mass immigration out of naivity. "Me get instagram likes, me happy" Women cluelessly vote for deconstruction of traditions that uphold civilization. "Me more free for 1-2 generations, me happy" Etc. Giving women the vote is a fatal mistake by men. But women all across the west will get a taste of their desired freedom soon enough as civilization crumbles because of them.

So I had assumed in part that your response was also very anti-women having voting rights since you responded immediately below that. I'm sorry about that. Voted for Dr. Paul in the 2012 primaries, but lean a little more towards civic nationalism now despite being married to a very legal immigrant. I just want to see this country focused on it's own people for a few generations. We have a good melting pot as it is, and people would benefit from finding common grounds instead of focusing on supremecies.

Good grief, I've had to edit this post 3 times for the format.

[–]JasonCarswell 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

"It's even shittier to think that they had to contribute to a system financially that they weren't even allowed to vote in."

This is tragic / ironic on many levels.

1) If voting were effective they'd make it illegal.

2) There's over 40 ways to rig the vote, and "they" are active on all of them all the time.

3) A Princeton study proved the masses opinions are never considered.

4) We spend the best parts of our waking lives in non-democratic work places serving bosses who serve their bosses, etc. (Even independents have banks, taxes, etc.)

Democratic worker directed enterprises, aka worker coops, are never discussed nor promoted as an alternative solution in the corporate media for a reason. They can't even stand unions. If people actually knew about this then they'd be forming coops right now instead of being unemployed and frantic.

[–]Comatoast 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

With the way that we have everything dependant on tech, it'll only get easier too. I feel like extremely shitty things are right there at the surface and maybe even a majority of people know about and understand what's going on to a degree, but no one wants to rock the boat and make the small comforts end.

We've got all of these fantastic technological advancements and they've effectively fucked us over by making it easier to work us for longer. Christ, you can't even look in the direction of a trade or a warehouse/general labor job without seeing a metric fuckton of required overtime now.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Truth. And it will get worse now, as desperate people will soon do anything for pittance work.

[–]Comatoast 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Until the working class revolts, which isn't likely to happen.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

They wouldn't know how to revolt and the MSM is intentionally currently teaching them how NOT to have a successful revolt.

The mainstream has been distracted and dumbed down on purpose. Ironic considering we're in the age of the Internet.

[–]Comatoast 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

We're effectively doomed anyway. I'm patiently waiting for societal collapse or a big, tasty ass meteor to zoot us out of existence.

[–]72ndGender 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Even today, women don't actually pay taxes. They take out more than they put it. They're a net drain on the tax system.

[–]Comatoast 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Ok, not every woman is working or poverty level or squatting out on government cheese. That was an extremely stupid comment and you should feel ashamed.

[–]72ndGender 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

net drain on the system

Don't be a fucking retard. You know the context here was women as a group, not "every woman." You should be ashamed of yourself for trying to slip in such a disingenuous argument so that you can try to insult me.

[–]Comatoast 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's too generalized a term though, blanket statements and all. And I hate that seeking temporary aid is seen as something bad. Men should have accesses to the same safety nets, especially if they're responsible for children (and in the cases of single fathers, those benefits are there that I'm awareof--if you know of something different please inform me). It's not something that anyone should remain on for a lengthy period of time though, and should incentivized to become independent of.

[–]72ndGender 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree, and I'm not against social safety nets. Like you, I just don't want them to be a lifetime support system. I don't even remember why I made a comment about net tax contribution, but I recognize that generalized statements don't help in an argument. Unless the argument is an aggregate analysis of groups' contribution to taxes...

[–]Comatoast 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Also, whoops. I mentally tangeanted and started thinking we were talking about working class women pre-50s.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

When I researched my genealogy, most of the women in my family worked before the 1950s, too.

[–]Comatoast 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's a special kind of pride in it though. They're rolemodels in their own way by fighting to simply exist and make it along.

It was probably extremely common with WWII and really any wartime, yeah?