#DontKillCrypto: The Infrastructure Bill Contains a Poison Pill for Crypto: Senators Wyden, Lummis, and Toomey Try to Stop It

submitted by Drewski from (fee.org)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

You didnt explain anything though and you literally called fascism right wing. If you had actually red the book instead of choice parts that your favorite websites cherry picked to make a point you would know how wrong you are. Also this is all besides the point because my point was hitler hated capitalism. A point you steadfastly ignored throughout your diatribe. You are probably very educated but poorly learned.

Instead of focusing on the surface of mundane things like the design of the nazi flag, you should read what hitler wrote about why used the Jews as a scapegoat to help him rise to power. You might find some parallels to today that make you feel uncomfortable.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

What? I gave you the literal definitions and historical assessments. The blue text links to its origin (Wikipedia). It's the common definition of Fascism (tending to be authoritarian and right wing). It seems we'll not be able to discuss anything.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Wikipedia is one of the worst sources for anything political on the net. Also, of you were learned you would know that citing encyclopedias (which is what wiki claims to be) is a no go. You gotta cite the original source. Im sure it wont be hard to find a dozen left leaning bs articles for you to shove into posts though so don't worry.

We can't discuss anything because the definitions of things that you use all come from extremely partisan sources.

Furthermore we never do discuss anything because you refuse to engage in dialog. You just copy and past articles that you agree with. You come at everything from a perspective of "this is how the right is bad." You own position negates dialog with anyone from the outset. That's why mostly stick to short rebuttals with you. Feel free to cry again to the mods about harassment though.

TL;DR who pays you to be here?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

WTF?

I engaged in dialogue.

Definitions at Wikipedia are in many other places and are not extremely partisan.

The problem is that you do not understand (or want to understand) anything I am writing. You have this make-believe concept of Fascism &c that hardly anyone would see as factual. Essentially, we're arguing about facts, but at a very low level, where you've redefined words in a manner that almost no one with a basic education would agree with.

You also want to think that someone pays me to be at Saidit, which says a lot about your approaches. Think for a second how many people care about discussions at Saidit, especially with people who have make-believe ideas about politics.

[–]skeech 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

especially with people who have make-believe ideas about politics.

that would everyone that doesnt agree with socks.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yea yea yea, "im not partisan, you are!" Great comeback. Literally never been used before in the history of humanity.

Who pays you?

[–]skeech 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

he is in here full time, like this is his career or something.. he hates jewish people... and he is queer like three dollar bills.

you should be vaccinated before even video chatting with him.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think socks is a female but could be wrong. Do you mean queer as in gay or queer as in has blue hair and says they are nonbinary? If the former, being gay shouldnt affect your opinion of them, if it does that says something about you. If the latter, I would not be surprised.

[–]skeech 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

lol.