all 8 comments

[–]magnora7[S] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

This "revolving door" between industry and regulation is illegal in many countries. But not in the US.

This is a huge reason we are in the situation with the mRNA "vaccines" we have now. They wouldn't be regulating something that's so untested if the FDA wasn't literally run by the same people who run the "vaccine" manufacturing companies.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Wasn’t there a Exxon mobile ceo on trumps team? Like Rex? Why isn’t he on here?

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's not a complete list, and it's a bit dated too. I'd love an updated list

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Same. Thanks for sharing. It is a gold list.

[–]IkeConn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Like the FCC and USPS. Mail service has gone to shit and they still haven't fired that guy.

[–]Nightjar 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Actually, I think it's the reverse. The government pushed for these people to be in charge of these companies, so the government could indirectly push for policies that would otherwise be considered unconstitutional.

Government can't legally prevent you from speaking?...Twitter enters the room...

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah perhaps it's a bit of both. But I think the corporate profit motive was driving 90% of the lobbying for the last 100 years that led to all these regulatory bodies being like they are.

[–]raven9 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's a revolving door that works both ways. The government is the companies and the companies is the government.