Its OK when they do it 🤪 Here are 24 STRAIGHT MINUTES of Democrats denying election results

submitted by [deleted] from twitter.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]no_u 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

The Russian misinformation accusations have been proven to have been false

The opposite. There has been substantial information on this since 2016. Russian disinformation is an OLD and developing problem. It's commonly known and easy to look up. Reconsider your sources. Or read:

https://www.state.gov/disarming-disinformation/

https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE198.html

https://www.state.gov/russias-pillars-of-disinformation-and-propaganda-report/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_disinformation

https://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/schwerpunkte/EN/disinformation/examples-of-russian-disinformation-and-the-facts.html

etc....

And - no - Trump was only destructive during his term, and added $10 trillion to the national debt by giving the .01% tax breaks.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Oh do fuck off you paid shill. Nobody believes your lies. There was an investigation, Trump was cleared of any Russian interference. He was on the other hand victim to domestic interference such as the Twitter censorship of stories that could have affected the vote.

[–]GuyWhite 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Even the major crooked newspapers have admitted that “Russian collusion” was a lie. Rachel Maddcow lost 30%of her viewers. At this point, maintaining the lie does nothing but discredit the liar, who is u/no_u.

[–]no_u 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

We're not discussing direct collusion. We're discussing indirect collusion. Big difference.