Video: UK Health Security Head Admits Use Of Face Masks Was Never ‘Evidence Based’

submitted by [deleted] from modernity.news

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]passionflounder 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Cuck-muzzle mandates were largely psychological. Their general use furnished a constant reminder that we were in "unprecedented" times. They also reinforced the premise that a centralized authority could credibly micromanage how individuals behaved and set the table for the future creation of a new criminal class.

[–]binaryblob 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Cuck-muzzle mandates

Man, what a literary piece of art.

Masks probably work, if everyone follows the instructions to the letter, which they literally can't.

The real lesson humanity should have learned is that apparently humanity is a shit species and the most effective way (for a technologically underdeveloped species) to deal with a pandemic is to infect everyone once a pandemic is declared and just see who lives or dies. This also accomplishes a genetic pool strengthening.

I really doubt the numbers regarding "saved lives", even more how many high quality years of life have been saved.

I don't doubt that vaccines can theoretically work, but in this case it spread across the world before the vaccines were developed and a natural infection is still probably the best (although most unpleasant) way to get protection.

[–]Bigs 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There are good reasons we've NEVER had an accepted coronavirus vaccine. One of those reasons is previous attempts have created antibody-dependent enhancement of disease or ADE - for a brief period it seems to protect, but it actually makes the disease WORSE.

If I could find that out 3 years ago then there is zero chance the powers that shouldn't be didn't know that.

[–]binaryblob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

One of those reasons is previous attempts have created antibody-dependent enhancement of disease or ADE - for a brief period it seems to protect, but it actually makes the disease WORSE.

If you post such statements, please add a citation.

[–]Bigs 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I was able to find loads about it at the beginning, same as (to my own surprise) I found plenty of studies showing masks don't work - at all, for anything - and then saw those same studies vanishing off the net.

I was looking at the mask studies as I presumed they must do something and was trying to build a case for them, but found the total opposite. Every study done found they were pretty useless, even at what they were intended for, which is to stop staff accidentally spitting into open wounds during surgery. When actually studied, infection rates were identical with or without the masks. Many of the studies were done with dentists, who also found they make zero difference.

Studies looking at other uses, such as stopping or reducing flu infections found them also totally fucking useless.

Now it's surprisingly hard to find those studies, as they've been systematically removed. I saved a number of links and they soon turned to 404s, with my favorite being a page saying 'If you are looking for the study showing masks are ineffective against influenza infection, it has been removed due to the ongoing pandemic."

They literally censored real-world data because it went against the narrative.

So should I bother trying to find the studies proving previous coronavirus attempts create ADE? Nah.

Look for yourself, and be sure to use Google, so you can waste your time instead of mine.

Or just ask Fauci:

https://youtu.be/ZrWAqpPGAxQ?si=DuJXXlAvqIwGby24&t=188

"Certain diseases" include coronaviruses, and that lying weasel knew that full well.