The conspiracy is now mainstream and cat's out of the bag.... "Millions Killed For Profit -Covid Was State Sponsored Genocide - Dr. David Martin To EU Parliament". History of covid weapoization and patents going back decades.

submitted by yellowsnow2 from youtu.be

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TemporarilyDeceased 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

If you want to hear some counter-points: https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/financial-analyst-david-martin-misrepresents-studies-patent-applications-promote-baseless-claim-sars-cov-2-developed-bioweapon/

[–]yellowsnow2[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The claims in your link can easily be debunked by the Wuhan scientists themselves. Published in Journal of Virology in 2008 by the Wuhan scientists (listed names at top). Explains step by step how they were successful in cleaving the "human ACE2" receptor to the bat virus. They use the word "human" leaving no ambiguity to the fact they were making it infectious to humans as the virus' target. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.01085-07?permanently=true

[–]R51 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Long winded rant incoming;

Shit like this pisses me off. I highly doubt the vaccine was developed to harm humans, because why the fuck would gov'ts create a propaganda for a virus to push a vaccine, when they could have just as easily put it in the fucking flu vaccine? If the ill-intent is truly there, I'm pretty sure morals are out the fuckin window, aren't they? So why would they craft up a story about some vague mystery virus then. Those two things are just too contradictory for me to entertain the idea that gov't is acting with malice with the vaccine. If they had the resolve to fool people and inject a test drug, then they'd also just as easily have the resolve to lie about it and just inject it anyway with other vaccines.

But what pisses me off is that I googled some fact-check websites for the vid in the OP. Results can basically be summed up as "there's no proof on either side of the fence, therefore this is definitively false". Are you fucking kidding me? And if I post this frustration anywhere else people will jump the gun and won't entertain the discussion cuz 'misinformation'. Everything about this virus and vaccine's reporting is sketchy as fuck---not because of the reality of it, not its infection rate, nor the bleeding cutting edge crazy borderline science fiction awesome mrna technique implemented to fight it, no ---it's the media's utterly SHIT job of staying objective, as though to intentionally split the populace.

Don't get me wrong the people complaining about masks in the beginning were insufferable, then it escalated from there and then people started blaming the government for BOTH: not being locked down enough, and for being too locked down. Meanwhile the news was split between these two notions, coincidentally CORRELATION DOES NOT EQUAL CAUSATION the democrats were pro, republicans were con. As though fucking political party is enough of an indicator for raw critical thinking, some of the smartest people I know don't know how to open Facebook let alone what the fuck is going on in the white house. If you asked them "are you left leaning or right leaning" they'd leave the room.

But no, republican now means (left to right): Oppressive, transphobic, paranoid, misinformation, anti-community, for the community, thinking for yourself, objective, resiliance, freedom, intolerant to bigotry.

Democrat now means (right to left): intolerant to bigotry, freedom, resiliance, objective, thinking for yourself, for the community, anti-community, overly-sensitive, delusional, kid diddler, oppressive.

So done w this crap. You're all assholes.

[–]Alphix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The flu vaccine doesn't have that much market penetration. If you scare people hard enough, you can get 90% of the people taking an injection.

I mean, Pfizer had been working on that "vaccine" that doesn't work for decades. A liability-free push to inject essentially the entire population was just what poor poor Pfizer needed to keep "protecting human health" ya know?

[–]R51 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I considered that, but what would be the purpose of requiring critical mass? It could be done over the course of years with various injections. There is plenty of people who get vaccines for there to be a sample size of its effects. So it makes zero sense that the objective was to "see what happens" in an experimental sense.

And if I consider another objective, to reduce the population, it still doesn't fit at all. Poisoning water, produce, air, introducing radioactive elements into areas, the ways in which governments have to quietly kill a population and get away with it is endless. And not only that, they can choose which part of the population to kill off. Why the fuck would they do it with a vaccine?

If experimentation is the objective, there's no need to have it be done all at once. There's enough of a sample size of people who get regular injections for unrelated reasons to conclude the effects of an experimental drug. If death is the objective, there still is no reason to do it all at once.

So it still wouldn't fit. Am I wrong here?

[–]Alphix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well the objective is OBVIOUSLY to get people to take a genetic alteration treatment disguised as a "vaccine".