you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]yellowsnow2 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

At up to 2kw it actually might. I always thought it was the power that mattered and that is a higher powered one.

The human body is an electrical/ionic system that normally only sees about 100-120v at 10picoamp (per sq meter) from the atmosphere. I covered a lot of that info in this post if you missed it.

https://saidit.net/s/conspiracy/comments/autk/we_are_energy_beings_of_light_electric_and/

[–]Brewdabier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Cell phones emit radiation in the radiofrequency region of the electromagnetic spectrum. Second-, third-, and fourth-generation cell phones (2G, 3G, 4G) emit radiofrequency in the frequency range of 0.7–2.7 GHz. Fifth-generation (5G) cell phones are anticipated to use the frequency spectrum up to 80 GHz.

These frequencies all fall in the nonionizing range of the spectrum, which is low frequency and low energy. The energy is too low to damage DNA. By contrast, ionizing radiation, which includes x-rays, radon, and cosmic rays, is high frequency and high energy. Energy from ionizing radiation can damage DNA. DNA damage can cause changes to genes that may increase the risk of cancer.

The human body does absorb energy from devices that emit radiofrequency radiation. The only consistently recognized biological effect of radiofrequency radiation absorption in humans that the general public might encounter is heating to the area of the body where a cell phone is held (e.g., the ear and head). However, that heating is not sufficient to measurably increase core body temperature. There are no other clearly established dangerous health effects on the human body from radiofrequency radiation.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There are no other clearly established dangerous health effects on the human body from radiofrequency radiation.

Not yet, but there might be in the future.

Some experiments have suggested that there may be biological effects at non-thermal exposure levels, but the evidence for production of health hazard is contradictory and unproven. The scientific community and international bodies acknowledge that further research is needed to improve our understanding in some areas.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-ionizing_radiation

[–]Brewdabier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The discovery of electromagnetic waves, including radio waves, by Heinrich Rudolf Hertz in the 1880s. So how far in the future, 500, 1000.