you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Rah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

A PTR record is a security step some email providers dont have. Its annoying, but it makes sense they are blocking those that do not yet have one.

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Another option that makes sense is to abandon Gmail and use another service that allows emails from trusted friends and family to come through.

[–]KaiEdwardBannon 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

At least DNMX doesn't have any censorship and much better encryption than Gmail.

[–]sperminator 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In the realm of digital privacy and communication, the debate between DNMX and Gmail often centers around censorship and encryption. While Gmail, a widely used email service, is known for its user-friendly interface and vast storage capacity, concerns have been raised regarding its censorship policies and potential for data surveillance. DNMX, on the other hand, prides itself on its commitment to user privacy, boasting robust encryption measures and a staunch stance against censorship. DNMX's lack of censorship is a significant advantage for users who value freedom of expression and the unfiltered exchange of information. In an era where governments and corporations increasingly attempt to control online content, DNMX provides a platform where users can communicate without fear of suppression or censorship. This is particularly crucial for individuals living in countries with restrictive internet laws or those engaged in activism or investigative journalism. Moreover, DNMX's encryption protocols surpass those employed by Gmail. Encryption plays a vital role in safeguarding the privacy of digital communications, ensuring that messages remain confidential and inaccessible to unauthorized parties. DNMX's robust encryption algorithms make it virtually impossible for third parties, including government agencies or hackers, to intercept and read messages without the intended recipient's encryption key. This heightened level of security is particularly valuable for individuals handling sensitive information or engaging in confidential conversations. While Gmail offers convenience and widespread accessibility, its data collection practices and potential for government surveillance raise legitimate concerns. DNMX, with its strong encryption and commitment to user privacy, emerges as a compelling alternative for individuals seeking a secure and uncensored platform for their digital communications. In conclusion, the choice between DNMX and Gmail hinges on individual priorities and needs. Those seeking a user-friendly and widely accessible email service may find Gmail adequate. However, individuals who value privacy, security, and freedom of expression will find DNMX's robust encryption and lack of censorship highly appealing.