use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~2 users here now
WayOfTheBern using reddit shadow banning on saidit
submitted 10 months ago * by Dragonerne from self.censorship
view the rest of the comments →
[–]AXXA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (13 children)
None of that changes the fact the they have a right to limit the topic of the sub. They're not acting with bias. They simply don't want to discuss that aspect in either direction.
[–]Dragonerne[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - 10 months ago (5 children)
It is against saidit moderator rules unless they make it explicit. If they want to ban good faith debaters then they have to remove themselves from s/all or change their sidebar
[–]AXXA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (4 children)
You're not banned from the sub. The fact that the removals are done by automod indicates the comments are off topic. I just searched the mod rules and I couldn't find anything about having to be explicit about what's off topic. I do still feel that you have a point that it would be nice if they were. But /u/magnora7 might consider that to be micromanaging.
[–]Dragonerne[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun - 10 months ago (2 children)
The fact that the removals are done by automod indicates the comments are off topic.
Naming the jew is "off topic" when talking about a jew?
The saidit rules say:
Mods must not remove user comments and posts that are on-topic and made in good faith UNLESS one of these conditions are met:
So they are not allowed to just shadow ban all comments naming the jew
[–]Alphix 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 10 months ago (1 child)
Clearly you are in the right.
[–]LarrySwinger2 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (5 children)
That's different from targeting users with automoderator. If someone breaks the rules, first you warn them, then you ban them in a transparent way.
[–]AXXA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (3 children)
I had assumed that automod was targeting a topic and not an user, but we actually don't know that one way or the other. You could ask the sub moderators for that information.
[–]LarrySwinger2 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (1 child)
Just look at the logs. It seems to remove all of Dragoerne's posts. Although verification is indeed important.
[–]AXXA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (0 children)
Yeah, you changed my mind. I think you're probably right. And I think that you're right in your original point that better communication is needed. The sub mods should be a part of this discussion.
[–]Alphix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (0 children)
The target is Dragonerne himself.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]AXXA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (13 children)
[–]Dragonerne[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - (5 children)
[–]AXXA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]Dragonerne[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun - (2 children)
[–]Alphix 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–]LarrySwinger2 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]AXXA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]LarrySwinger2 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]AXXA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Alphix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)