Musk Says Twitter Has "No Actual Choice" But Comply With Government Censorship Demands

submitted by Drewski from (reclaimthenet.org)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bucetao6969 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

BUT not freedom of reach

This does makes sense.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They intentionally throttle content. That means that if it was going to organically reach many people, they would stop it.

A bunch of old men yelling at clouds will get boring and will not get popular unless there's something unique and/or authentic about it. Nothing can get popular unless it's allowed to. This is SOFT CENSORSHIP, no matter how you spin it.