Musk Says Twitter Has "No Actual Choice" But Comply With Government Censorship Demands
submitted 11 months ago by Drewski from (reclaimthenet.org)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]chadwickofwv 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun - 11 months ago (9 children)
In other words, Musk has no balls.
[–]bucetao6969 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 11 months ago (7 children)
But he has integrity. He won't censorship himself but has to comply with other countries. That's fine by me.
[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - 11 months ago (6 children)
But he has integrity.
Nonsense. Musk is a limited hangout. Alex Jones broke no rules and is still banned.
[–]bucetao6969 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 11 months ago (5 children)
He got banned pre-ellon also Ellon unbanned Trump so maybe it's just a matter of someone having enough interest to unban him. Your argument doesn't really work.
[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 11 months ago (4 children)
Your justification doesn't work.
Elon himself has said everyone should have freedom of speech BUT not freedom of reach - making up new bullshit limitations and rules as he goes.
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 11 months ago (1 child)
Kind of makes sense: “old man yells obscenities at clouds”. Should the whole world hear it? Should it reach the sky?
[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 11 months ago (0 children)
That's not what it is.
They intentionally throttle content. That means that if it was going to organically reach many people, they would stop it.
A bunch of old men yelling at clouds will get boring and will not get popular unless there's something unique and/or authentic about it. Nothing can get popular unless it's allowed to. This is SOFT CENSORSHIP, no matter how you spin it.
[–]bucetao6969 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 11 months ago (1 child)
BUT not freedom of reach
This does makes sense.
[–]POOPCORN 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 11 months ago (0 children)
I briefly read the article and the Turkish government made demands of Mr musk but Mr musk could just say f*** off to the Turkish government and he could say if they don't like it block it.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~2 users here now
view the rest of the comments →
[–]chadwickofwv 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun - (9 children)
[–]bucetao6969 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (7 children)
[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - (6 children)
[–]bucetao6969 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (4 children)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]bucetao6969 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]POOPCORN 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)