use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~0 users here now
YouTube has deleted over 800,000 videos that contradict the WHO
submitted 3 years ago by [deleted] from reclaimthenet.org
view the rest of the comments →
[–]fred_red_beans 17 insightful - 7 fun17 insightful - 6 fun18 insightful - 6 fun18 insightful - 7 fun - 3 years ago (3 children)
This is how you know when they say "follow the science" they mean "follow the mob".
[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - 3 years ago (2 children)
No - this is what it means when an anti-vax disinformation website links to its source at another anti-vax disinformation website that provides no evidence for the disinformation that 800,000 were deleted:
https://www.axios.com/youtube-removed-30000-covid19-vaccine-videos-misinformation-a8968086-95a4-4d5e-86da-0e22ddbc1b6a.html
Why don't more people question obvious disinformation like this, regardless of their personal interests in vaccines?
It's also not surprising that Youtube wants to remove anti-science and anti-facts disinformation videos. If there are 1000 of them or 30,000 in recent months, think about the special interest groups that are funding the anti-vax campaigns. It's not that they care about anti-vax people. It's that they want people to get used to questioning facts and science. This will help elect Republicans, who can win only with these kinds of people
[–]Iswearbymyfloralhat 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (1 child)
No, its surprising. And science, by definition needs to be questioned. Also, this vaccine will kill way more than the virus. They knew back in 2012 that a corona vax would cause hypersensitivity and advised against it."Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated." Now when everyone that has the jab gets the seasonal flu, they might die. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3335060/
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
Very good article. Although "caution ...[was] indicated," that 2012 research was superseded in 2020 with other approaches and numerous trials that included studies of the hypersensitivity. As one develops antibodies to certain viruses - including the seasonal flu - one is less likely to suffer the consequences of a virus outbreak. A remaning question might be: will people become dependent on seasonal flu jabs? In any event, reducing the spread of the virus so that people can return to work is another benefit of this widely tested vaccine (even if it's in conjunction with masks and social distancing). And now it seems 100 million in the US have had the first jab. Are they fucked? Not likely.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]fred_red_beans 17 insightful - 7 fun17 insightful - 6 fun18 insightful - 6 fun18 insightful - 7 fun - (3 children)
[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - (2 children)
[–]Iswearbymyfloralhat 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)