all 15 comments

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Howls for all species enjoying yiff!

[–]catlover1019[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Hello there. Howls indeed.

[–]Ontario56 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Not a zoophile, but I’ll hang around anyways

[–]catlover1019[S,M] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

That's not an issue. We would still value your input to any discussion, just remember that this sub is not the appropriate place to debate the morality of zoophilia itself. Anyway, welcome to the sub.

[–]Ontario56 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Thanks. My biggest debate right now isn’t whether zoophilia is moral anyway, so no worries. It’s just that I don’t know where on the “spectrum” I lie. I guess someday I’ll find out.

[–]catlover1019[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Np. I mean, I know I'm attracted to (non-human) animals and very interested in doing sexy/loving things with them, but I haven't really done anything yet.

I'm also free to chat if you want, about zoophilia, or anything else. Hit me up on the PMs here, and we could either talk there, or find another place that works for both of us.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

u/Hongkongphooey will not let you

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No I dont want any goddamn animal fuckers here, get lost

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

😮

[–]WalterLatrans 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Quick question. When you say:

"Don't be an elitist prick: Don't claim that someone isn't really a zoophile, unless they admit to hurting animals on purpose and are unrepentant."

Are you implying that hurting animals is required to be a zoophile? ( I'm referring to physical pain here, not any theoretical ethical issues. ) If not you may want to make that more clear.

[–]catlover1019[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Quite the opposite. I'm claiming that if one does hurt animals that it would be appropriate the call them not really a zoophile. I apologize for my late reply.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

About 20 years ago or so there was an email thing forwarded around about a human dolphin testimony. It was quite educations but also very fringe.

[–]catlover1019[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I mean, there's actually a relatively mainstream (as in you can buy it in physical form on Amazon) novel about that. It's called Wet Goddess. I'm not sure if that's the same individual/couple as what you saw, but it's definitely a similar example. I think it's more about the emotional rather than physical aspect, but there was definitely a physical aspect. I haven't read it because I'm a faggot and vagina scares me :P

I should note that the novel is fictional, but it's based on true (zoophilic) events. The author is a zoophile activist, and claims he did have sex with a dolphin.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I don't think it's the same. But maybe. It was just a couple pages worth.

If I can still recall correctly, it was a scientist and not a Sea Park, so they were studying the creatures, not for entertainment. But that came up in a way because they needed to be satiated to have focus.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

😮