Doggy dick by [deleted] in Zoophilia

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

😮

Welcome by catlover1019 in Zoophilia

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

😮

Welcome by catlover1019 in Zoophilia

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No I dont want any goddamn animal fuckers here, get lost

Welcome by catlover1019 in Zoophilia

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

u/Hongkongphooey will not let you

Doggy dick by [deleted] in Zoophilia

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

s/zoophilia ? You sick fuck

Doggy dick by [deleted] in Zoophilia

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

😮

Doggy dick by [deleted] in Zoophilia

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Hey, I'm a furry, yeah.... but the image of a real dog, with a dog's level of intelligence, having sex is definitely NOT a turn on. Ew, thanks for ruining my dinner....

Doggy dick by [deleted] in Zoophilia

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

u/queenbread loves this stuff ew

Doggy dick by [deleted] in Zoophilia

[–]jr_ 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Because you're raping animals. At least gay people's partners can give consent

Welcome by catlover1019 in Zoophilia

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

😮

Discord for Zoophilia Discussion by Ok-Dawg_987 in Zoophilia

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You should be an admin - Airbus - no one knows all of the posts on Saidit the way you do

Discord for Zoophilia Discussion by Ok-Dawg_987 in Zoophilia

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

u/socks don't look here or you will be blind!

Reddit's Strange Policies on Zoo Stuff by Rastafoo in Zoophilia

[–]Ok-Dawg_987 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Legality doesn't determine morality or ethics.

Discord for Zoophilia Discussion by Ok-Dawg_987 in Zoophilia

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

😭

Discord for Zoophilia Discussion by Ok-Dawg_987 in Zoophilia

[–]Ok-Dawg_987[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Insightful

Discord for Zoophilia Discussion by Ok-Dawg_987 in Zoophilia

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I dindu nuffin!

Discord for Zoophilia Discussion by Ok-Dawg_987 in Zoophilia

[–]Ok-Dawg_987[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Tfw you're a literal racist and you wanna give your input on people needing to be put down like animals.

Ow the irony

Discord for Zoophilia Discussion by Ok-Dawg_987 in Zoophilia

[–]Ok-Dawg_987[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What the fuck is wrong with you?

Discord for Zoophilia Discussion by Ok-Dawg_987 in Zoophilia

[–]Ok-Dawg_987[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Cry some more for me

Discord for Zoophilia Discussion by Ok-Dawg_987 in Zoophilia

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Tell it to s/incest too

Discord for Zoophilia Discussion by Ok-Dawg_987 in Zoophilia

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The only thing perverts should have in common with animals is that they need to be put down like animals.

Discord for Zoophilia Discussion by Ok-Dawg_987 in Zoophilia

[–]Tarrock 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

What the fuck is wrong with you?

Reddit's Strange Policies on Zoo Stuff by Rastafoo in Zoophilia

[–]Ok-Dawg_987 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Is Reddit hypocritical?

You're damn right it is.

Reddit's Strange Policies on Zoo Stuff by Rastafoo in Zoophilia

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

😮

Reddit's Strange Policies on Zoo Stuff by Rastafoo in Zoophilia

[–]OffAndSphere 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Well, this subsaidit died.

The reason why real zoophilia isn't allowed is because I'm pretty sure it's illegal to have sex with animals in a lot of places.

Doggy dick by [deleted] in Zoophilia

[–]Hoodless21 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Mmm love horse cock and cum, like a fire hose of pure pleasure 😍

Doggy dick by [deleted] in Zoophilia

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Humans are animals. Animals fuck all the time. My first boyfriend was a golden retriever. We fucked a bit and would have lots more had we been able to. For someone to say that what we did was harmful/evil/wrong is very offensive to me. Again, sex is normally a good thing as long as everyone involved is happy and safe. The idea that sex is somehow some complex thing that will hurt someone if they "don't understand it" is crazy word salad. If any sex ever somehow hurt someone mentally or physically, I'm against it, but this idea that someone is mentally traumatized by seeing nudity or sex or by having it is all propaganda by religions, governments, and all the humans who have already been brainwashed into believing it. Sex and nudity are both natural normal things that everyone does except brainwashed humans, and even they will usually shamefully do it in secret.

But this is all getting into the area of "discussing the ethics of zoophilia as a whole" and while I have no problem discussing it, it is against the rules here.

Doggy dick by [deleted] in Zoophilia

[–]HorseMeat 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't have much else to say here. Perhaps it's because I'm not the most open minded. My main concern with this particular fetish is the fact the animals don't really understand what's going on. I've read several stories on the chans & elsewhere. It seems to have undesirable effects on the animal. Is it even possible for both human & animal to perform intercourse or sexual acts without causing emotional damage to the animal?

Doggy dick by [deleted] in Zoophilia

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No one who isn't gay can really fully understand what it's like to like dicks, either, but let's just say that it's similar to liking cunts!

As long as everyone involved is safe and happy, then sex is a good thing between everyone of all species, races, genders, ages, or anything else. Sex is just pleasuring someone, and pleasuring someone is normally good. It's social bonding and playing with others in fun loving happy ways. The fact that so many human societies are so brainwashed about the topic of sex and treat it as some horrible thing is horrible. The rich and powerful love it because turning everyone into individuals rather than collective loving groups means they can continue to abuse others and the masses won't rise up to stop them.

Doggy dick by [deleted] in Zoophilia

[–]HorseMeat 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Fetishes generally are a bit of taboo subject. I can't say I'll ever fully understand it, but I guess it's nice you guys have an open place to discuss these things.

Doggy dick by [deleted] in Zoophilia

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Okay, that wasn't obvious at first, lol. Zoophilia still isn't as commonly accepted as gay rights are for example, so you caught me off guard. ^n.n^

Doggy dick by [deleted] in Zoophilia

[–]HorseMeat 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Everything's a joke when I'm around.

Doggy dick by [deleted] in Zoophilia

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I guess you're making a joke or something, not sure. Horses like cumming just as much as anyone else.

Doggy dick by [deleted] in Zoophilia

[–]HorseMeat 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Uhhh... stay away from the poor horses meat.

Doggy dick by [deleted] in Zoophilia

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Also, horses can cum loads, so don't forget about horse dicks. <3

Why does one have to be kind to animals to be considered a zoophile? by Ontario56 in Zoophilia

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sure and I agree, but I'm answering your quesiton about "zoophile", not "attraction". That's why many who call themselves zoophiles call it "bestiality" when someone doesn't love other species. I'm not going to even research what "bestiality" might normally have meant though because I don't really care since "zoo" and "zoophile" is good enough for me. All that really matters is that words can be used to communicate.

Why does one have to be kind to animals to be considered a zoophile? by Ontario56 in Zoophilia

[–]Ontario56[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, it’s definitely not something a lot of people are comfortable with, but it exists, so I just wanted to address it. A man can still be attracted to women and flog them in BDSM, but people wouldn’t question his attraction to women- at least, I don’t think. I’ve never seen a case of someone calling such a sadist “gay”, for example. It was just a weird thought I had :P

Why does one have to be kind to animals to be considered a zoophile? by Ontario56 in Zoophilia

[–]Ontario56[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Attraction doesn’t always have to be nice is all I’m saying. Sexual attraction doesn’t care too much if the other being is evil or not, oftentimes. That’s why hatefucking exists, for example

Why does one have to be kind to animals to be considered a zoophile? by Ontario56 in Zoophilia

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Greek suffix "phile" means "love". I assume that's the cause of the terminology disagreement. If it just meant "attraction to" then anyone who is attracted to someone of a certain type would fix that definition.

Aaand I'm too late because /u/catlover1019 already made this same comment, lol.

Why does one have to be kind to animals to be considered a zoophile? by Ontario56 in Zoophilia

[–]WalterLatrans 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I suppose my argument against that would be that most people who perform sadism against animals are probably more sexually stimulated by the act of causing pain than they are the actual animals. Their use of animals is probably more a convenience to them as there would be easier access and lower repercussions if caught.

Of course I'm sure as you say there are zoophiles that are indeed attracted to animals that are also sadist, particularity if they self identify as zoophiles and the assumption isn't just being made from their actions or news reports.

That being said, as I don't particularity enjoy the thought of rape or rapist, I'm also not very thrilled by idea or actions of zoosadists. I am of the opinion that zoophilia can be healthy and enjoyed by all as long as all parties are having a good time.

Also sorry for my late reply to your late reply :-P

edit: spelling, formatting

Why does one have to be kind to animals to be considered a zoophile? by Ontario56 in Zoophilia

[–]catlover1019 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Well, I guess I'm not sticking strictly to the modern definition. This sub is for people who both love animals and are sexually attracted to them.

Why does one have to be kind to animals to be considered a zoophile? by Ontario56 in Zoophilia

[–]Ontario56[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Right, however, Philia is now used for sexual attraction as well, so the modern definition is the one I’m using. Also, I don’t think it’s too much of a difference, judging by the examples I’ve given. Sexual attraction has many forms, after all. Some people like vanilla and some go full out crazy kinky.

Yeah, they’re not exactly the type to garner respect if they act on it.

Why does one have to be kind to animals to be considered a zoophile? by Ontario56 in Zoophilia

[–]catlover1019 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

My take on it goes back to the meaning of the suffix "philia" it wasn't originally sexual attraction, but rather 'love', and not specifically the erotic sort. Also, there is a subtle difference between being sexually attracted to someone and being turned on by the thought of inflicting pain upon them. That doesn't actually require sexual attraction.

Also, I have no respect for anyone who would actually hurt an animal. Fantasizing about it is one thing, because one really can't help what makes them horny, but actually doing it is another.

Welcome by catlover1019 in Zoophilia

[–]catlover1019[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Quite the opposite. I'm claiming that if one does hurt animals that it would be appropriate the call them not really a zoophile. I apologize for my late reply.

Why does one have to be kind to animals to be considered a zoophile? by Ontario56 in Zoophilia

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I see. Again, I would just ignore this whole sub and everything related to it

Why does one have to be kind to animals to be considered a zoophile? by Ontario56 in Zoophilia

[–]Ontario56[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The sub rules state that you can’t say “you’re not really a zoophile” to anyone unless that person enjoys inflicting harm upon animals. I’m just questioning that

Why does one have to be kind to animals to be considered a zoophile? by Ontario56 in Zoophilia

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My thoughts: Who cares and why does it matter?

Welcome by catlover1019 in Zoophilia

[–]WalterLatrans 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Quick question. When you say:

"Don't be an elitist prick: Don't claim that someone isn't really a zoophile, unless they admit to hurting animals on purpose and are unrepentant."

Are you implying that hurting animals is required to be a zoophile? ( I'm referring to physical pain here, not any theoretical ethical issues. ) If not you may want to make that more clear.

Welcome by catlover1019 in Zoophilia

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think it's the same. But maybe. It was just a couple pages worth.

If I can still recall correctly, it was a scientist and not a Sea Park, so they were studying the creatures, not for entertainment. But that came up in a way because they needed to be satiated to have focus.

Welcome by catlover1019 in Zoophilia

[–]catlover1019[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I mean, there's actually a relatively mainstream (as in you can buy it in physical form on Amazon) novel about that. It's called Wet Goddess. I'm not sure if that's the same individual/couple as what you saw, but it's definitely a similar example. I think it's more about the emotional rather than physical aspect, but there was definitely a physical aspect. I haven't read it because I'm a faggot and vagina scares me :P

I should note that the novel is fictional, but it's based on true (zoophilic) events. The author is a zoophile activist, and claims he did have sex with a dolphin.

Welcome by catlover1019 in Zoophilia

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

About 20 years ago or so there was an email thing forwarded around about a human dolphin testimony. It was quite educations but also very fringe.

Welcome by catlover1019 in Zoophilia

[–]catlover1019[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Np. I mean, I know I'm attracted to (non-human) animals and very interested in doing sexy/loving things with them, but I haven't really done anything yet.

I'm also free to chat if you want, about zoophilia, or anything else. Hit me up on the PMs here, and we could either talk there, or find another place that works for both of us.

Welcome by catlover1019 in Zoophilia

[–]Ontario56 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks. My biggest debate right now isn’t whether zoophilia is moral anyway, so no worries. It’s just that I don’t know where on the “spectrum” I lie. I guess someday I’ll find out.

Welcome by catlover1019 in Zoophilia

[–]catlover1019[S,M] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's not an issue. We would still value your input to any discussion, just remember that this sub is not the appropriate place to debate the morality of zoophilia itself. Anyway, welcome to the sub.

Welcome by catlover1019 in Zoophilia

[–]Ontario56 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Not a zoophile, but I’ll hang around anyways

Welcome by catlover1019 in Zoophilia

[–]catlover1019[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Hello there. Howls indeed.

Welcome by catlover1019 in Zoophilia

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Howls for all species enjoying yiff!