It's TheirAgenda vs OurAgenda: UsurperDom 3.0 vs Usurper-freeDom 1.0

submitted by EddieC from self.WritingsOnTheWall

 
The agenda that the 99% focus on, wins
 
Hence, the 1% have to keep the 99% away from OurAgenda
 
Their plan for doing so is quite simple actually:
 
First – "Awaken" dissidents to TheirAgenda
Then – "Lead" dissidents against TheirAgenda, instead of towards OurAgenda
Next – "Weaponize" dissidents to keep each other focused on TheirAgenda, instead of pursuing OurAgenda
 
Everything is at stake for the 1%,
hence they spare no effort in "awakening", "leading" & "weaponizing" dissidents,
for the moment the 99% realize they must focus on OurAgenda and need only shun usurpers for Usurper-free Dom,
the 1% would lose their ability to usurp the 99%
possibly permanently.
 

all 14 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Drewski 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Hey ChatGPT, rewrite the following so it could be understood by a five year old

There are some people who have a lot of money and power, and they don't want everyone else to have the same things they do. They have a plan to stop other people from working together to get what they want. They try to convince some people to follow their plan instead of working together. They also try to make people fight with each other so they don't work together. They do this because they are afraid of losing their power if everyone works together. If everyone does work together, they will be able to make things better for themselves and not let those people with a lot of power take advantage of them anymore.

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Ehhhhhh 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    I like them both, but prefer the original.

    However, I would be tempted to save the summary and start using it as a response to people who are like, "why would anyone conspire to do X?"

    [–]Alphix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    I like the ELI5 version. It's a nice change from all those conspiracy analysts who give themselves airs of high intellectuals...

    [–]Ehhhhhh 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    I didn't think that the original was overly intellectual. I like how it actually lays out the basic strategy whereas the dumbed down version is too general.

    [–]EddieC[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    If you like this one, here's another one that I did before, ICYMI
     

    [–]Ehhhhhh 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I like the examples on that.

    [–]EddieC[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    This place is just full of bots

    [–]Ehhhhhh 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I think most sites have been for quite awhile.

    I'd started paying attention more during the shareblue/ctr stuff. Why would anyone turn off bots and paid shills after that?

    Even if one agency or marketing firm lost funding, another would pick it back up. You probably have bots/shills even talking back and forth from different companies.

    [–]Ehhhhhh 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    Not sure if any particular post is better for discussion...

    Anyhow, one thing that I wonder is approach. Maybe we all have our own approach?

    Like, we can not play into their bs and distractions, but what does that actually mean as far as fighting them?

    For me, I think that striving for self-sufficiency and being independent from the "system" is one way of just rejecting the system and its entanglements. Even with that, I guess you'd still have taxes and be impacted by any laws (such as how some areas restrict rainwater collection or hunting/fishing permits or licenses) so you'd still not be free of the system totally.

    Like, for me, it also means understanding how they've poisoned our minds and bodies for generations and what, if anything, we can do to literally heal ourselves and others.

    [–]EddieC[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Not sure if any particular post is better for discussion...

     
    No one likes being scammed. So, maybe start by discussing the potential and actual risk of getting scammed and how to avoid / significantly reduce the risks...
     

    [–]Ehhhhhh 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    I dunno. You seem to just keep linking through posts. While I can understand referencing stuff you've already talked about, it seems disjointed. Like, create a wiki or something to lay out the idea. By sending everyone to somewhere else and through a constant trail of never-ending links, seems like you are doing the job of distracting and confusing any attempts to actually work together.

    [–]EddieC[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    By sending everyone to somewhere else and through a constant trail of never-ending links, seems like you are doing the job of distracting and confusing any attempts to actually work together.

     
    Did you mention you want to work together? I must have missed that
    Or, maybe u/Magnora7 had a word with you for engaging with me...
    Stick with s/TumblrInAction - that's where all the bots (AI & otherwise) are gathered
     

    [–]Ehhhhhh 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    I think you must be the bot.

    [–]EddieC[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Is this not a forum for people to discuss ideas & solutions?
    I am starting to think: maybe it is a forum for bots, to usurp & push/crowd out real people... based on the bizarre behavior & responses I see here
     
    Don't I have a wiki?
    Yes I do - you should know where to look
    - but it is in need of updating - I haven't gotten round to doing it because it takes time and there are different viewpoints that need to be addressed - that's what I am doing through the posts
     
    Do I have all the answers?
    No, I don't
    But I try to list them as best I can & as soon as they crystalize
    - and some (i.e. Direct X v Indirect X) did so only recently
     
    Is it my fault if the reader (bot or not) cannot read the banner and imagine usurper-free Dom - real freedom?
     

    seems like you are doing the job of distracting and confusing any attempts to actually work together.

     
    No one needs to work with me as you now have the cheat sheet
    - in a nutshell:
     

    Systems & usurpation-risk

    • Indirect systems are at-risk
    • Direct systems are risk-free

     
    So, there are no more excuses...

     
    Those who see the way out – to usurper-free Dom,
    and yet choose not to act toward it
    in effect choose
    to remain in usurper Dom
    and ultimately
    to be in cahoots with the usurpers