Hamas surprise attack a ‘historic failure’ for Israeli intelligence services

submitted by neolib from france24.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]binaryblob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The US would cut support to Israel if they did this, which in turn would mean the end of Israel, from what I understand.

If Israel had the ability to meaningfully defend itself from all its enemies without the US, I think Gaza would have been burned to the ground already. (I am not advocating for either side.)

[–]brimshae 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

The US would cut support to Israel if [anything]

You funny.

[–]binaryblob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well, then what is stopping Israel from genocide? It would be a trivial solution to the conflict, because if everyone is dead, there is nobody to have a conflict with. Someone must be protecting the people in Gaza and it's not Hamas, because if Israel were to just drop napalm over the entire area in one night the world would likely just shrug and Hamas would be dead too. Israel could also starve the population to death.

I don't think Israeli leaders are opposed to genocide. So, who, if not the US, is stopping Israel from doing that? How hard is it to learn to answer the fucking implied question?

[–]musky-the-nigger 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I think it's all about US jew public sentiment. They are largely progressive and Democrats. If these US voting jews get pissed enough at their Democratic party zionist leaders, then US support of Israel is actually in danger. Aka the kike zionist Democrats are not aligned with their anti-Zionist kike constituents. In the last 20 years this has become a partisan issue.