'Racism Is a Feature of Capitalism' Claims Labour MP Zarah Sultana

submitted by scrubking from breitbart.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

People should look into the actual facts of anarchism.

No rulers. Self governing.

Laissez-faire economics.

People who oppose it either:

A) have been Brainwashed to fear Independence and need/want to be taken care of...
Or...
B) like systems of control and the power it gives them over others.
Or...
C) have no idea what they're talking about.

I'd estimate ~98% of people fall into category A and/or C.
The 3 categories are not mutually exclusive.

[–]the-ham-bummer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

D) those who notice that anarchist movements are often financed by powerful competing nations or interests.

I am all for subsidiary government entities. And anarchism as a global ultimate objective is fine. But IMHO it cannot be implemented locally, unless you have nukes to defend yourself and you are ready to use them, probably on your own territory.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

D) those who notice that anarchist movements are often financed by powerful competing nations or interests.

Who are these externally financed anarchist movements you're referring to?

Did they provide money to each leaderless individual?

[–]the-ham-bummer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The people in the comment section get it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpPS9IWXSa4

Note also the arguments of the debunkers of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9x9dZdlL8Y , which basically cite Soros organization which denies a SUBSET of the accusations. I have seen a lot of that in Italy. "Nooo, Andreotti didn't kiss a mafioso therefore the whole link to mafia is debunked". Sure thing, LOL. In fact your questions seem to be aiming in the same direction. Well if you want to argue about anti fascists helping out for globalists by attacking nationalists and not being financed by globalists vs. being financed by globalists you are welcome to do so, but IMHO it's the fruit that tells about the tree.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well if you want to argue about anti fascists helping out for globalists by attacking nationalists and not being financed by globalists vs. being financed by globalists you are welcome to do so

I'm not disagreeing with this.

My question was:

Who are these externally financed anarchist movements you're referring to?

[–]the-ham-bummer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You know who they are. "Defund the police" is anarchist. "No voter ID" is anarchist. Joe Biden opening the borders is anarchist. It's an anarchy meant to destroy some aspects of the older system and build another totalitarian system ofc. If you thought I was referring to the original "man can auto organize with no need for overarching authority" anarchy, I was of course not, because it would complicate things for the financers. If you object to the term, then we shouldn't use the term antifa, social justice warriors, egalitarians, minority rights for movements clearly aimed at dividing and conquering the masses and rewriting history (reparation for slavery? and where are the reparations to europe for centuries of pillages by those across the mediterranean and those turks?)