you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Dragonerne 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

[–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Lol you have zero ability to process new information when it doesn't tell you what you want to hear. I gave you links to articles answering this question that were written by people that actually know what they're talking about, and your response is to put different parts of the same section of the constitution in bold? Like you're the only one that has ever read the constitution or something?

My best guess is that you don't understand that it's the job of the judicial system to interpret the constitution, and that in the event of conflict the Supreme Court has the final say, and that they're usually very good at it. That or else you're just a spoiled manchild that doesn't understand how to take "No." for an answer.

[–]Zahn 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Fedin, you're always so vitriolic and verbally abusive! Maybe if you could take it down just a notch so it doesn't sound so much like theres a screeching teenager around.

The difference in jargon would be Legal vs Lawful.

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Sorry, I can't help it. Stupid people annoy me. Self-absorbed people annoy me. This guy established that he is both.

[–]Zahn 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You both have points, yours is on legal ground and his is on lawful ground.